(1) When a defendant is found to be a persistent felony offender, the jury, in lieu of the
sentence of imprisonment assessed under KRS 532.060 for the crime of which such
person presently stands convicted, shall fix a sentence of imprisonment as
authorized by subsection (5) or (6) of this section. When a defendant is charged
with being a persistent felony offender, the determination of whether or not he is
such an offender and the punishment to be imposed pursuant to subsection (5) or (6)
of this section shall be determined in a separate proceeding from that proceeding
which resulted in his last conviction. Such proceeding shall be conducted before the
court sitting with the jury that found the defendant guilty of his most recent offense
unless the court for good cause discharges that jury and impanels a new jury for that
purpose.
(2) A persistent felony offender in the second degree is a person who is more than
twenty-one (21) years of age and who stands convicted of a felony after having been
convicted of one (1) previous felony. As used in this provision, a previous felony
conviction is a conviction of a felony in this state or conviction of a crime in any
other jurisdiction provided:
(a) That a sentence to a term of imprisonment of one (1) year or more or a
sentence to death was imposed therefor; and
(b) That the offender was over the age of eighteen (18) years at the time the
offense was committed; and
(c) That the offender:
1. Completed service of the sentence imposed on the previous felony
conviction within five (5) years prior to the date of commission of the
felony for which he now stands convicted; or
2. Was on probation, parole, postincarceration supervision, conditional
discharge, conditional release, furlough, appeal bond, or any other form
of legal release from any of the previous felony convictions at the time
of commission of the felony for which he now stands convicted; or
3. Was discharged from probation, parole, postincarceration supervision,
conditional discharge, conditional release, or any other form of legal
release on any of the previous felony convictions within five (5) years
prior to the date of commission of the felony for which he now stands
convicted; or
4. Was in custody from the previous felony conviction at the time of
commission of the felony for which he now stands convicted; or
5. Had escaped from custody while serving any of the previous felony
convictions at the time of commission of the felony for which he now
stands convicted.
(3) A persistent felony offender in the first degree is a person who is more than twenty-
one (21) years of age and who stands convicted of a felony after having been
convicted of two (2) or more felonies, or one (1) or more felony sex crimes against
a minor as defined in KRS 17.500, and now stands convicted of any one (1) or more
felonies. As used in this provision, a previous felony conviction is a conviction of a
felony in this state or conviction of a crime in any other jurisdiction provided:
(a) That a sentence to a term of imprisonment of one (1) year or more or a
sentence to death was imposed therefor; and
(b) That the offender was over the age of eighteen (18) years at the time the
offense was committed; and
(c) That the offender:
1. Completed service of the sentence imposed on any of the previous
felony convictions within five (5) years prior to the date of the
commission of the felony for which he now stands convicted; or
2. Was on probation, parole, postincarceration supervision, conditional
discharge, conditional release, furlough, appeal bond, or any other form
of legal release from any of the previous felony convictions at the time
of commission of the felony for which he now stands convicted; or
3. Was discharged from probation, parole, postincarceration supervision,
conditional discharge, conditional release, or any other form of legal
release on any of the previous felony convictions within five (5) years
prior to the date of commission of the felony for which he now stands
convicted; or
4. Was in custody from the previous felony conviction at the time of
commission of the felony for which he now stands convicted; or
5. Had escaped from custody while serving any of the previous felony
convictions at the time of commission of the felony for which he now
stands convicted.
(4) For the purpose of determining whether a person has two (2) or more previous
felony convictions, two (2) or more convictions of crime for which that person
served concurrent or uninterrupted consecutive terms of imprisonment shall be
deemed to be only one (1) conviction, unless one (1) of the convictions was for an
offense committed while that person was imprisoned.
(5) A person who is found to be a persistent felony offender in the second degree shall
be sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment pursuant to the sentencing
provisions of KRS 532.060(2) for the next highest degree than the offense for which
convicted. A person who is found to be a persistent felony offender in the second
degree shall not be eligible for probation, shock probation, or conditional discharge,
unless all offenses for which the person stands convicted are Class D felony
offenses which do not involve a violent act against a person, in which case
probation, shock probation, or conditional discharge may be granted. A violent
offender who is found to be a persistent felony offender in the second degree shall
not be eligible for parole except as provided in KRS 439.3401.
(6) A person who is found to be a persistent felony offender in the first degree shall be
sentenced to imprisonment as follows:
(a) If the offense for which he presently stands convicted is a Class A or Class B
felony, or if the person was previously convicted of one (1) or more sex
crimes committed against a minor as defined in KRS 17.500 and presently
stands convicted of a subsequent sex crime, a persistent felony offender in the
first degree shall be sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment, the
maximum of which shall not be less than twenty (20) years nor more than fifty
(50) years, or life imprisonment, or life imprisonment without parole for
twenty-five (25) years for a sex crime committed against a minor;
(b) If the offense for which he presently stands convicted is a Class C or Class D
felony, a persistent felony offender in the first degree shall be sentenced to an
indeterminate term of imprisonment, the maximum of which shall not be less
than ten (10) years nor more than twenty (20) years.
(7) A person who is found to be a persistent felony offender in the first degree shall not
be eligible for probation, shock probation, or conditional discharge, unless all
offenses for which the person stands convicted are Class D felony offenses which
do not involve a violent act against a person or a sex crime as that term is defined in
KRS 17.500, in which case, probation, shock probation, or conditional discharge
may be granted. If the offense the person presently stands convicted of is a Class A,
B, or C felony, the person shall not be eligible for parole until the person has served
a minimum term of incarceration of not less than ten (10) years, unless another
sentencing scheme applies. A violent offender who is found to be a persistent felony
offender in the first degree shall not be eligible for parole except as provided in
KRS 439.3401.
(8) A conviction, plea of guilty, or Alford plea under KRS 218A.1415 shall not trigger
the application of this section, regardless of the number or type of prior felony
convictions that may have been entered against the defendant. A conviction, plea of
guilty, or Alford plea under KRS 218A.1415 may be used as a prior felony offense
allowing this section to be applied if he or she is subsequently convicted of a
different felony offense.
(9) The provisions of this section amended by 1994 Ky. Acts ch. 396, sec. 11, shall be
retroactive.
(10) (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, this section shall not
apply to a person convicted of a criminal offense if the penalty for that offense
was increased from a misdemeanor to a felony, or from a lower felony
classification to a higher felony classification, because the conviction
constituted a second or subsequent violation of that offense.
(b) This subsection shall not prohibit the application of this section to a person
convicted of:
1. A felony offense arising out of KRS 189A.010, 189A.090, 506.140,
508.032, 508.140, or 510.015; or
2. Any other felony offense if the penalty was not enhanced to a higher
level because the Commonwealth elected to prosecute the person as a
first-time violator of that offense.
Effective: July 12, 2012
History: Amended 2012 Ky. Acts ch. 156, sec. 19, effective July 12, 2012. -- Amended
2011 Ky. Acts ch. 2, sec. 26, effective June 8, 2011. -- Amended 2006 Ky. Acts ch.
182, sec. 45, effective July 12, 2006. -- Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 606, sec. 76,
effective July 15, 1998. -- Amended 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 247, sec. 1, effective April 4,
1996. -- Amended 1994 Ky. Acts ch. 396, sec. 11, effective July 15, 1994. --
Amended 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 241, sec. 1, effective July 15, 1982. -- Amended 1978
Ky. Acts ch. 78, sec. 6, effective June 17, 1978. -- Amended 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.)
Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 474, effective January 2, 1978. -- Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch.
180, sec. 1, effective June 19, 1976. -- Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 280,
effective January 1, 1975.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
516
cases (
143 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case:
Morrow v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W.3d 558 (Ky. 2002).
Morrow v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W.3d 558 (Ky. 2002).
· cites it 60× “[14] The age limitations in KRS 532.080 reserve PFO enhancement for more mature offenders who have failed previous attempts at rehabilitation.”
Parke v. Raley, 506 U.S. 20 (1993).
· cites it 10× “Kentucky's "Persistent felony offender sentencing" statute, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 532.080 (Michie 1990), provides mandatory minimum sentences for repeat felons.”
Parson v. Commonwealth, 144 S.W.3d 775 (Ky. 2004).
· cites it 14× “080(3)(c)(1) and KRS 532.080(2)(c) (same requirements apply to PFO 1st and PFO 2nd enhancement).”
Montgomery v. Commonwealth, 819 S.W.2d 713 (Ky. 1991).
· cites it 12× “Their position is that the failure to require the jury to set a sentence for the underlying offense violates mandatory ("shall") language in the PFO statute, KRS 532.080, and therefore we should apply "the rule established in Wellman v.”
McClanahan v. Commonwealth, 308 S.W.3d 694 (Ky. 2010).
· cites it 9× “except that (c) The aggregate of consecutive indeterminate terms shall not exceed in maximum length the longest extended term which would be authorized by KRS 532.080 for the highest class of crime for which any of the sentences is imposed.”
Castle v. Commonwealth, 411 S.W.3d 754 (Ky. 2013).
· cites it 24× “crime for which a previous sentence of probation or conditional discharge has been revoked, the multiple sentences shall run concurrently or consecutively as the court shall determine at the time of sentence, except that: [[Image here]] (c) The aggregate of consecutive…”
Turner v. Commonwealth, 538 S.W.3d 305 (Ky. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 16× “Section 26 of HB 463 added a new provision to the persistent felony sentencing statute, KRS 532.080, stating in pertinent part as follows: [T]his section [requiring enhancement of a sentence when the defendant is a persistent felony offender] shall not apply to a person…”
Blane v. Commonwealth, 364 S.W.3d 140 (Ky. 2012).
· cites it 11× “13 Under KRS 532.080, the Kentucky PFO statute, to be found guilty of being a first-degree PFO, a defendant must stand “convicted of a felony after having been convicted of two (2) or more felonies .”
Harris v. Commonwealth, 338 S.W.3d 222 (Ky. 2011).
· cites it 16× “In the twenty-seven years since Hayes was rendered, KRS 532.080 has been amended and reenacted in new form on more than one occasion.”
St. Clair v. Commonwealth, 140 S.W.3d 510 (Ky. 2004).
· cites it 6× “080(2) & (3) of Kentucky's Persistent Felony Offender (PFO) statute, Melson v.”
Moore v. Commonwealth, 462 S.W.3d 378 (Ky. 2015).
· cites it 15× “This sentencing progression unambiguously illustrates the importance of the PFO stage of the trial, and it demonstrates with disquieting clarity why the PFO phase of the trial is not a lesser aspect of the trial proceedings, undeserving of even a single witness to testify…”
Dickerson v. Commonwealth, 174 S.W.3d 451 (Ky. 2005).
· cites it 6× “070(2), for which he was sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for twenty years, subsequently enhanced to thirty years because the jury found him to be a persistent felony offender in the second degree (PFO 2nd), KRS 532.080(2); one count of possession of a handgun by a…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(1) — 30 cases
Montgomery v. Commonwealth, 819 S.W.2d 713 (Ky. 1991).
“Their position is that the failure to require the jury to set a sentence for the underlying offense violates mandatory ("shall") language in the PFO statute, KRS 532.080, and therefore we should apply "the rule established in Wellman v.”
Morrow v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W.3d 558 (Ky. 2002).
“[14] The age limitations in KRS 532.080 reserve PFO enhancement for more mature offenders who have failed previous attempts at rehabilitation.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(10) — 4 cases
Turner v. Commonwealth, 538 S.W.3d 305 (Ky. Ct. App. 2017).
“Section 26 of HB 463 added a new provision to the persistent felony sentencing statute, KRS 532.080, stating in pertinent part as follows: [T]his section [requiring enhancement of a sentence when the defendant is a persistent felony offender] shall not apply to a person…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(10)(a) — 5 cases
Turner v. Commonwealth, 538 S.W.3d 305 (Ky. Ct. App. 2017).
“Section 26 of HB 463 added a new provision to the persistent felony sentencing statute, KRS 532.080, stating in pertinent part as follows: [T]his section [requiring enhancement of a sentence when the defendant is a persistent felony offender] shall not apply to a person…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(10)(b) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(10)(b)(2) — 2 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(2) — 77 cases
Harris v. Commonwealth, 338 S.W.3d 222 (Ky. 2011).
“In the twenty-seven years since Hayes was rendered, KRS 532.080 has been amended and reenacted in new form on more than one occasion.”
St. Clair v. Commonwealth, 140 S.W.3d 510 (Ky. 2004).
“080(2) & (3) of Kentucky's Persistent Felony Offender (PFO) statute, Melson v.”
Morrow v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W.3d 558 (Ky. 2002).
“[14] The age limitations in KRS 532.080 reserve PFO enhancement for more mature offenders who have failed previous attempts at rehabilitation.”
Dickerson v. Commonwealth, 174 S.W.3d 451 (Ky. 2005).
“070(2), for which he was sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for twenty years, subsequently enhanced to thirty years because the jury found him to be a persistent felony offender in the second degree (PFO 2nd), KRS 532.080(2); one count of possession of a handgun by a…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(2)(a) — 8 cases
Morrow v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W.3d 558 (Ky. 2002).
“[14] The age limitations in KRS 532.080 reserve PFO enhancement for more mature offenders who have failed previous attempts at rehabilitation.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(2)(b) — 5 cases
Morrow v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W.3d 558 (Ky. 2002).
“[14] The age limitations in KRS 532.080 reserve PFO enhancement for more mature offenders who have failed previous attempts at rehabilitation.”
Harris v. Commonwealth, 338 S.W.3d 222 (Ky. 2011).
“In the twenty-seven years since Hayes was rendered, KRS 532.080 has been amended and reenacted in new form on more than one occasion.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(2)(c) — 11 cases
Dickerson v. Commonwealth, 174 S.W.3d 451 (Ky. 2005).
“070(2), for which he was sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for twenty years, subsequently enhanced to thirty years because the jury found him to be a persistent felony offender in the second degree (PFO 2nd), KRS 532.080(2); one count of possession of a handgun by a…”
Parson v. Commonwealth, 144 S.W.3d 775 (Ky. 2004).
“080(3)(c)(1) and KRS 532.080(2)(c) (same requirements apply to PFO 1st and PFO 2nd enhancement).”
Morrow v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W.3d 558 (Ky. 2002).
“[14] The age limitations in KRS 532.080 reserve PFO enhancement for more mature offenders who have failed previous attempts at rehabilitation.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(2)(c)(2) — 3 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(2)(c)(3) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(2)(c)(l) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(2)(e)(l) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(3) — 89 cases
Parson v. Commonwealth, 144 S.W.3d 775 (Ky. 2004).
“080(3)(c)(1) and KRS 532.080(2)(c) (same requirements apply to PFO 1st and PFO 2nd enhancement).”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(3)(2) — 1 case
Moore v. Commonwealth, 462 S.W.3d 378 (Ky. 2015).
“This sentencing progression unambiguously illustrates the importance of the PFO stage of the trial, and it demonstrates with disquieting clarity why the PFO phase of the trial is not a lesser aspect of the trial proceedings, undeserving of even a single witness to testify…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(3)(a) — 4 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(3)(b) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(3)(c) — 11 cases
Moore v. Commonwealth, 462 S.W.3d 378 (Ky. 2015).
“This sentencing progression unambiguously illustrates the importance of the PFO stage of the trial, and it demonstrates with disquieting clarity why the PFO phase of the trial is not a lesser aspect of the trial proceedings, undeserving of even a single witness to testify…”
Parson v. Commonwealth, 144 S.W.3d 775 (Ky. 2004).
“080(3)(c)(1) and KRS 532.080(2)(c) (same requirements apply to PFO 1st and PFO 2nd enhancement).”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(3)(c)(1) — 4 cases
Parson v. Commonwealth, 144 S.W.3d 775 (Ky. 2004).
“080(3)(c)(1) and KRS 532.080(2)(c) (same requirements apply to PFO 1st and PFO 2nd enhancement).”
Moore v. Commonwealth, 462 S.W.3d 378 (Ky. 2015).
“This sentencing progression unambiguously illustrates the importance of the PFO stage of the trial, and it demonstrates with disquieting clarity why the PFO phase of the trial is not a lesser aspect of the trial proceedings, undeserving of even a single witness to testify…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(3)(c)(2) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(3)(c)(3) — 2 cases
Moore v. Commonwealth, 462 S.W.3d 378 (Ky. 2015).
“This sentencing progression unambiguously illustrates the importance of the PFO stage of the trial, and it demonstrates with disquieting clarity why the PFO phase of the trial is not a lesser aspect of the trial proceedings, undeserving of even a single witness to testify…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(3)(c)(l) — 2 cases
Parson v. Commonwealth, 144 S.W.3d 775 (Ky. 2004).
“080(3)(c)(1) and KRS 532.080(2)(c) (same requirements apply to PFO 1st and PFO 2nd enhancement).”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(3)(e) — 1 case
Moore v. Commonwealth, 462 S.W.3d 378 (Ky. 2015).
“This sentencing progression unambiguously illustrates the importance of the PFO stage of the trial, and it demonstrates with disquieting clarity why the PFO phase of the trial is not a lesser aspect of the trial proceedings, undeserving of even a single witness to testify…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(4) — 22 cases
Morrow v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W.3d 558 (Ky. 2002).
“[14] The age limitations in KRS 532.080 reserve PFO enhancement for more mature offenders who have failed previous attempts at rehabilitation.”
Parson v. Commonwealth, 144 S.W.3d 775 (Ky. 2004).
“080(3)(c)(1) and KRS 532.080(2)(c) (same requirements apply to PFO 1st and PFO 2nd enhancement).”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(4)(c) — 3 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(5) — 29 cases
Morrow v. Commonwealth, 77 S.W.3d 558 (Ky. 2002).
“[14] The age limitations in KRS 532.080 reserve PFO enhancement for more mature offenders who have failed previous attempts at rehabilitation.”
Blane v. Commonwealth, 364 S.W.3d 140 (Ky. 2012).
“13 Under KRS 532.080, the Kentucky PFO statute, to be found guilty of being a first-degree PFO, a defendant must stand “convicted of a felony after having been convicted of two (2) or more felonies .”
Turner v. Commonwealth, 538 S.W.3d 305 (Ky. Ct. App. 2017).
“Section 26 of HB 463 added a new provision to the persistent felony sentencing statute, KRS 532.080, stating in pertinent part as follows: [T]his section [requiring enhancement of a sentence when the defendant is a persistent felony offender] shall not apply to a person…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(6) — 9 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(6)(a) — 19 cases
Castle v. Commonwealth, 411 S.W.3d 754 (Ky. 2013).
“crime for which a previous sentence of probation or conditional discharge has been revoked, the multiple sentences shall run concurrently or consecutively as the court shall determine at the time of sentence, except that: [[Image here]] (c) The aggregate of consecutive…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(6)(b) — 83 cases
McClanahan v. Commonwealth, 308 S.W.3d 694 (Ky. 2010).
“except that (c) The aggregate of consecutive indeterminate terms shall not exceed in maximum length the longest extended term which would be authorized by KRS 532.080 for the highest class of crime for which any of the sentences is imposed.”
Parson v. Commonwealth, 144 S.W.3d 775 (Ky. 2004).
“080(3)(c)(1) and KRS 532.080(2)(c) (same requirements apply to PFO 1st and PFO 2nd enhancement).”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(7) — 16 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(8) — 9 cases
McClanahan v. Commonwealth, 308 S.W.3d 694 (Ky. 2010).
“except that (c) The aggregate of consecutive indeterminate terms shall not exceed in maximum length the longest extended term which would be authorized by KRS 532.080 for the highest class of crime for which any of the sentences is imposed.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 532.080(c) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.