Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010 (2026)

Operating motor vehicle with alcohol concentration of or above 0.08, or

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

of or above 0.02 for persons under age twenty-one, or while under the influence of alcohol, a controlled substance, or other substance which impairs driving ability prohibited -- Admissibility of alcohol concentration or controlled substance test results -- Presumptions -- Penalties -- Aggravating circumstances. (1) A person shall not operate or be in physical control of a motor vehicle anywhere in this state: (a) Having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more as measured by a scientifically reliable test or tests of a sample of the person's breath or blood taken within two (2) hours of cessation of operation or physical control of a motor vehicle; (b) While under the influence of alcohol; (c) While under the influence of any other substance or combination of substances which impairs one's driving ability; (d) While the presence of a controlled substance listed in subsection (12) of this section is detected in the blood, as measured by a scientifically reliable test, or tests, taken within two (2) hours of cessation of operation or physical control of a motor vehicle; (e) While under the combined influence of alcohol and any other substance which impairs one's driving ability; or (f) Having an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or more as measured by a scientifically reliable test or tests of a sample of the person's breath or blood taken within two (2) hours of cessation of operation or physical control of a motor vehicle, if the person is under the age of twenty-one (21). (2) With the exception of the results of the tests administered pursuant to KRS 189A.103(7): (a) If the sample of the person's blood or breath that is used to determine the alcohol concentration thereof was obtained more than two (2) hours after cessation of operation or physical control of a motor vehicle, the results of the test or tests shall be inadmissible as evidence in a prosecution under subsection (1)(a) or (f) of this section. The results of the test or tests, however, may be admissible in a prosecution under subsection (1)(b) or (e) of this section; or (b) If the sample of the person's blood that is used to determine the presence of a controlled substance was obtained more than two (2) hours after cessation of operation or physical control of a motor vehicle, the results of the test or tests shall be inadmissible as evidence in a prosecution under subsection (1)(d) of this section. The results of the test or tests, however, may be admissible in a prosecution under subsection (1)(c) or (e) of this section. (3) In any prosecution for a violation of subsection (1)(b) or (e) of this section in which the defendant is charged with having operated or been in physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, the alcohol concentration in the defendant's blood as determined at the time of making analysis of his blood or breath shall give rise to the following presumptions: (a) If there was an alcohol concentration of less than 0.04 based upon the definition of alcohol concentration in KRS 189A.005, it shall be presumed that the defendant was not under the influence of alcohol; and (b) If there was an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater but less than 0.08 based upon the definition of alcohol concentration in KRS 189A.005, that fact shall not constitute a presumption that the defendant either was or was not under the influence of alcohol, but that fact may be considered, together with other competent evidence, in determining the guilt or innocence of the defendant. The provisions of this subsection shall not be construed as limiting the introduction of any other competent evidence bearing upon the questions of whether the defendant was under the influence of alcohol or other substances, in any prosecution for a violation of subsection (1)(b) or (e) of this section. (4) (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subsection, the fact that any person charged with violation of subsection (1) of this section is legally entitled to use any substance, including alcohol, shall not constitute a defense against any charge of violation of subsection (1) of this section. (b) A laboratory test or tests for a controlled substance shall be inadmissible as evidence in a prosecution under subsection (1)(d) of this section upon a finding by the court that the defendant consumed the substance under a valid prescription from a practitioner, as defined in KRS 218A.010, acting in the course of his or her professional practice. However, a laboratory test for a controlled substance may be admissible as evidence in a prosecution under subsection (1)(c) or (e) of this section. (5) Any person who violates the provisions of paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d), or (e) of subsection (1) of this section shall: (a) For the first offense within a ten (10) year period, be fined not less than two hundred dollars ($200) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500), or be imprisoned in the county jail for not less than forty-eight (48) hours nor more than thirty (30) days, or both. Following sentencing, the defendant may apply to the judge for permission to enter a community labor program for not less than forty-eight (48) hours nor more than thirty (30) days in lieu of fine or imprisonment, or both. If any of the aggravating circumstances listed in subsection (11) of this section are present while the person was operating or in physical control of a motor vehicle, the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment shall be four (4) days, which term shall not be suspended, probated, conditionally discharged, or subject to any other form of early release; (b) For the second offense within a ten (10) year period, be fined not less than three hundred fifty dollars ($350) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500) and shall be imprisoned in the county jail for not less than seven (7) days nor more than six (6) months and, in addition to fine and imprisonment, may be sentenced to community labor for not less than ten (10) days nor more than six (6) months. If any of the aggravating circumstances listed in subsection (11) of this section are present, the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment shall be fourteen (14) days, which term shall not be suspended, probated, conditionally discharged, or subject to any other form of early release; (c) For a third offense within a ten (10) year period, be fined not less than five hundred dollars ($500) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) and shall be imprisoned in the county jail for not less than thirty (30) days nor more than twelve (12) months and may, in addition to fine and imprisonment, be sentenced to community labor for not less than thirty (30) days nor more than twelve (12) months. If any of the aggravating circumstances listed in subsection (11) of this section are present, the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment shall be sixty (60) days, which term shall not be suspended, probated, conditionally discharged, or subject to any other form of early release; (d) For a fourth or subsequent offense within a ten (10) year period, be guilty of a Class D felony. If any of the aggravating circumstances listed in subsection (11) of this section are present, the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment shall be two hundred forty (240) days, which term shall not be suspended, probated, conditionally discharged, or subject to any other form of release; and (e) For purposes of this subsection, prior offenses shall include all convictions in this state, and any other state or jurisdiction, for operating or being in control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or other substances that impair one's driving ability, or any combination of alcohol and such substances, or while having an unlawful alcohol concentration, or driving while intoxicated, but shall not include convictions for violating subsection (1)(f) of this section. A court shall receive as proof of a prior conviction a copy of that conviction, certified by the court ordering the conviction. (6) Any person who violates the provisions of subsection (1)(f) of this section shall be fined no less than one hundred dollars ($100) and no more than five hundred dollars ($500), or sentenced to twenty (20) hours of community service in lieu of a fine. A person subject to the penalties of this subsection shall not be subject to the penalties established in subsection (5) of this section or any other penalty established pursuant to KRS Chapter 189A, except those established in KRS 189A.040(1) and KRS 189A.070. (7) If the person is under the age of twenty-one (21) and there was an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or greater based on the definition of alcohol concentration in KRS 189A.005, the person shall be subject to the penalties established pursuant to subsection (5) of this section. (8) For a second or third offense within a ten (10) year period, the minimum sentence of imprisonment or community labor shall not be suspended, probated, or subject to conditional discharge or other form of early release. For a fourth or subsequent offense under this section, the minimum term of imprisonment shall be one hundred twenty (120) days, and this term shall not be suspended, probated, or subject to conditional discharge or other form of early release. For a second or subsequent offense, at least forty-eight (48) hours of the mandatory sentence shall be served consecutively. (9) When sentencing persons under subsection (5)(a) of this section, at least one (1) of the penalties shall be assessed and that penalty shall not be suspended, probated, or subject to conditional discharge or other form of early release. (10) In determining the ten (10) year period under this section, the period shall be measured from the dates on which the offenses occurred for which the judgments of conviction were entered. (11) For purposes of this section, aggravating circumstances are any one (1) or more of the following: (a) Operating a motor vehicle in excess of thirty (30) miles per hour above the speed limit; (b) Operating a motor vehicle in the wrong direction on a limited access highway; (c) Operating a motor vehicle that causes an accident resulting in death or serious physical injury as defined in KRS 500.080; (d) Operating a motor vehicle while the alcohol concentration in the operator's blood or breath is 0.15 or more as measured by a test or tests of a sample of the operator's blood or breath taken within two (2) hours of cessation of operation of the motor vehicle; (e) Refusing to submit to any test or tests of one's blood, breath, or urine requested by an officer having reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating or in physical control of a motor vehicle in violation of subsection (1) of this section, except it shall not be considered an aggravating circumstance for a first offense under subsection (5)(a) of this section; and (f) Operating a motor vehicle that is transporting a passenger under the age of twelve (12) years old. (12) The substances applicable to a prosecution under subsection (1)(d) of this section are: (a) Any Schedule I controlled substance except marijuana; (b) Alprazolam; (c) Amphetamine; (d) Buprenorphine; (e) Butalbital; (f) Carisoprodol; (g) Cocaine; (h) Diazepam; (i) Hydrocodone; (j) Meprobamate; (k) Methadone; (l) Methamphetamine; (m) Oxycodone; (n) Promethazine; (o) Propoxyphene; and (p) Zolpidem. Effective: July 1, 2020 History: Amended 2019 Ky. Acts ch. 103, sec. 2, effective July 1, 2020. -- Amended 2016 Ky. Acts ch. 85, sec. 1, effective April 9, 2016. -- Amended 2010 Ky. Acts ch. 149, sec. 17, effective July 15, 2010. -- Amended 2002 Ky. Acts ch. 183, sec. 19, effective August 1, 2002. -- Amended 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 467, sec. 2, effective October 1, 2000. -- Amended 1998 Ky. Acts ch. 124, sec. 8, effective July 15, 1998; and ch. 606, sec. 171, effective July 15, 1998. -- Amended 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 198, sec. 10, effective October 10, 1996. -- Amended 1991 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 15, sec. 2, effective July 1, 1991. -- Created 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 165, sec. 1, effective July 13, 1984. Legislative Research Commission Note (4/9/2016). 2016 Ky. Acts ch. 85, sec. 10 provided that that Act shall be known as the Brianna Taylor Act. This statute was amended in Section 1 of that Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 243 cases (62 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Love v. Commonwealth, 55 S.W.3d 816 (Ky. 2001).
Love v. Commonwealth, 55 S.W.3d 816 (Ky. 2001). · cites it 20× “KRS 189A.010(1) stated in pertinent part: A person shall not operate or be in physical control of a motor vehicle anywhere in this state: (a) While the alcohol concentration in his blood or breath is 0.”
Commonwealth v. Ramsey, 920 S.W.2d 526 (Ky. 1996). · cites it 30× “We do not agree with this interpretation and overrule the above noted cases to the extent they conflict with the following discussion of KRS 189A.010. This Court first analyzed KRS 189A.”
Cook v. Commonwealth, 129 S.W.3d 351 (Ky. 2004). · cites it 14× “Inability to communicate with an attorney during this period shall not be deemed to relieve the person of his obligation to submit to the tests and the penalties specified by KRS 189A.010 and 189A.107 shall remain applicable to the person upon refusal.”
Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 136 S.W.3d 442 (Ky. 2004). · cites it 24× “On January 25, 2002, Respondent, Joshua Reynolds, was charged with DUI under KRS 189A.010. On February 12, 2002, Reynolds moved the trial court to dismiss the charges because the Commonwealth charged him under subsection (5)(a), which is not the charging subsection but rather…”
Cornelison v. Commonwealth, 52 S.W.3d 570 (Ky. 2001). · cites it 13× “KRS 189A.010(4) provides a comprehensive scheme of escalating penalties to be imposed on individuals who engage in the inherently dangerous activity of driving while under the influence of alcohol.”
Commonwealth v. Gaitherwright, 70 S.W.3d 411 (Ky. 2002). · cites it 13× “Effective October 1, 2000, KRS 189A.010 was amended to provide that “[rjefusing to submit to any test or tests of one’s blood, breath or urine requested by an officer having reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating or in physical control of a motor vehicle in…”
Ballinger v. Commonwealth, 459 S.W.3d 349 (Ky. 2015). · cites it 32× “1988), a case in which the Court of Appeals construed an earlier version of KRS 189A.010 as providing for a “conviction-to-conviction” enhancement scheme.”
Commonwealth v. Ball, 691 S.W.2d 207 (Ky. 1985). · cites it 18× “The issue we decide is whether under KRS 189A.010, known generally as the “slammer” bill, convictions for driving under the influence received prior to July 13, 1984 (the effective date of the present statute), can be used in applying the penalty section of the statute in…”
Lynch v. Commonwealth, 902 S.W.2d 813 (Ky. 1995). · cites it 16× “The appeal arises from a jury trial wherein appellant was found guilty of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicants (KRS 189A.010). The judgment of the district court was affirmed by both Fayette Circuit Court and the Court of Appeals.”
Hudson v. Commonwealth, 202 S.W.3d 17 (Ky. 2006). · cites it 6× “OPINION OF THE COURT On January 18, 2005, a Montgomery Circuit Court jury convicted Appellant, Emory Hudson, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”), fourth offense, KRS 189A.010(1), (5)(d), (ll)(d), a class D Felony, and of being a persistent…”
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Telly Savalas Denson, 529 S.W.3d 739 (Ky. 2017). · cites it 12× “OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE VENTERS In April 2016, the Governor signed into law SB 66, which amended KRS 189A.010, Kentucky’s principal driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) statute.”
Veltrop v. Commonwealth, 269 S.W.3d 15 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 32× “The relevant portion of KRS 189A.010 states as follows: (1) A person shall not operate or be in physical control of a motor vehicle anywhere in the state: (a) Having an alcohol concentration of 0.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(1) — 65 cases
Lynch v. Commonwealth, 902 S.W.2d 813 (Ky. 1995). “The appeal arises from a jury trial wherein appellant was found guilty of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicants (KRS 189A.010). The judgment of the district court was affirmed by both Fayette Circuit Court and the Court of Appeals.”
Love v. Commonwealth, 55 S.W.3d 816 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(1) stated in pertinent part: A person shall not operate or be in physical control of a motor vehicle anywhere in this state: (a) While the alcohol concentration in his blood or breath is 0.”
Hudson v. Commonwealth, 202 S.W.3d 17 (Ky. 2006). “OPINION OF THE COURT On January 18, 2005, a Montgomery Circuit Court jury convicted Appellant, Emory Hudson, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”), fourth offense, KRS 189A.010(1), (5)(d), (ll)(d), a class D Felony, and of being a persistent…”
Commonwealth v. Ramsey, 920 S.W.2d 526 (Ky. 1996). “We do not agree with this interpretation and overrule the above noted cases to the extent they conflict with the following discussion of KRS 189A.010. This Court first analyzed KRS 189A.”
Leocal v. Ashcroft, 543 U.S. 1 (2004).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(1)(8) — 1 case
Gentry v. Deuth, 381 F. Supp. 2d 614 (W.D. Ky. 2004).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(1)(a) — 17 cases
Love v. Commonwealth, 55 S.W.3d 816 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(1) stated in pertinent part: A person shall not operate or be in physical control of a motor vehicle anywhere in this state: (a) While the alcohol concentration in his blood or breath is 0.”
Page v. Commonwealth, 149 S.W.3d 416 (Ky. 2004).
State v. Eumana-moranchel, 277 P.3d 549 (Or. 2012).
Commonwealth v. Brown, 560 S.W.3d 873 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018).
Commonwealth v. Walther, 189 S.W.3d 570 (Ky. 2006).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(1)(b) — 9 cases
Love v. Commonwealth, 55 S.W.3d 816 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(1) stated in pertinent part: A person shall not operate or be in physical control of a motor vehicle anywhere in this state: (a) While the alcohol concentration in his blood or breath is 0.”
Commonwealth v. Walther, 189 S.W.3d 570 (Ky. 2006).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(1)(c) — 11 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(1)(d) — 2 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(10) — 1 case
Ballinger v. Commonwealth, 459 S.W.3d 349 (Ky. 2015). “1988), a case in which the Court of Appeals construed an earlier version of KRS 189A.010 as providing for a “conviction-to-conviction” enhancement scheme.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(11) — 1 case
Ballinger v. Commonwealth, 459 S.W.3d 349 (Ky. 2015). “1988), a case in which the Court of Appeals construed an earlier version of KRS 189A.010 as providing for a “conviction-to-conviction” enhancement scheme.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(11)(c) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Brown, 560 S.W.3d 873 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(11)(e) — 4 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(12) — 2 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(12)(l) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(2) — 8 cases
Veltrop v. Commonwealth, 269 S.W.3d 15 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008). “The relevant portion of KRS 189A.010 states as follows: (1) A person shall not operate or be in physical control of a motor vehicle anywhere in the state: (a) Having an alcohol concentration of 0.”
Commonwealth v. Wirth, 936 S.W.2d 78 (Ky. 1996).
Ratliff v. Commonwealth, 719 S.W.2d 445 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986).
Commonwealth v. Mattingly, 98 S.W.3d 865 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(2)(a) — 7 cases
Healthwise of Kentucky, Ltd. v. Anglin, 956 S.W.2d 213 (Ky. 1997).
Commonwealth v. Ball, 691 S.W.2d 207 (Ky. 1985). “The issue we decide is whether under KRS 189A.010, known generally as the “slammer” bill, convictions for driving under the influence received prior to July 13, 1984 (the effective date of the present statute), can be used in applying the penalty section of the statute in…”
Farmer v. Commonwealth, 6 S.W.3d 144 (Ky. Ct. App. 1999).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(2)(b) — 5 cases
Woods v. Commonwealth, 793 S.W.2d 809 (Ky. 1990).
Tipton v. Commonwealth, 770 S.W.2d 239 (Ky. Ct. App. 1989).
Asher v. Commonwealth, 763 S.W.2d 153 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988).
Royalty v. Commonwealth, 749 S.W.2d 700 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988).
Commonwealth v. Beard, 275 S.W.3d 205 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(2)(c) — 1 case
Royalty v. Commonwealth, 749 S.W.2d 700 (Ky. Ct. App. 1988).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(3) — 4 cases
Cook v. Commonwealth, 129 S.W.3d 351 (Ky. 2004). “Inability to communicate with an attorney during this period shall not be deemed to relieve the person of his obligation to submit to the tests and the penalties specified by KRS 189A.010 and 189A.107 shall remain applicable to the person upon refusal.”
Ratliff v. Commonwealth, 719 S.W.2d 445 (Ky. Ct. App. 1986).
Commonwealth v. Mattingly, 98 S.W.3d 865 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(3)(a) — 2 cases
Kentucky Unemployment Ins. Comm'n v. Duro Bag Mfg. Co., 250 S.W.3d 351 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(3)(b) — 2 cases
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(4) — 10 cases
Commonwealth v. Ramsey, 920 S.W.2d 526 (Ky. 1996). “We do not agree with this interpretation and overrule the above noted cases to the extent they conflict with the following discussion of KRS 189A.010. This Court first analyzed KRS 189A.”
Cornelison v. Commonwealth, 52 S.W.3d 570 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(4) provides a comprehensive scheme of escalating penalties to be imposed on individuals who engage in the inherently dangerous activity of driving while under the influence of alcohol.”
Butler v. Groce, 880 S.W.2d 547 (Ky. 1994).
Dedic v. Commonwealth, 920 S.W.2d 878 (Ky. 1996).
Commonwealth v. Garnett, 8 S.W.3d 573 (Ky. Ct. App. 1999).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(4)(a) — 3 cases
Cornelison v. Commonwealth, 52 S.W.3d 570 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(4) provides a comprehensive scheme of escalating penalties to be imposed on individuals who engage in the inherently dangerous activity of driving while under the influence of alcohol.”
Commonwealth v. Walther, 189 S.W.3d 570 (Ky. 2006).
Epperson v. Commonwealth, 437 S.W.3d 157 (Ky. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(4)(b) — 3 cases
Hourigan v. Commonwealth, 962 S.W.2d 860 (Ky. 1998).
Epperson v. Commonwealth, 437 S.W.3d 157 (Ky. Ct. App. 2014).
Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Gettys, 924 S.W.2d 500 (Ky. 1996).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(4)(c) — 3 cases
Cornelison v. Commonwealth, 52 S.W.3d 570 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(4) provides a comprehensive scheme of escalating penalties to be imposed on individuals who engage in the inherently dangerous activity of driving while under the influence of alcohol.”
Barker v. Commonwealth, 32 S.W.3d 515 (Ky. Ct. App. 2000).
Botkin v. Commonwealth, 890 S.W.2d 292 (Ky. 1994).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(4)(d) — 5 cases
Commonwealth v. Ramsey, 920 S.W.2d 526 (Ky. 1996). “We do not agree with this interpretation and overrule the above noted cases to the extent they conflict with the following discussion of KRS 189A.010. This Court first analyzed KRS 189A.”
Osborne v. Commonwealth, 992 S.W.2d 860 (Ky. Ct. App. 1998).
Anderson v. Commonwealth, 905 S.W.2d 871 (Ky. Ct. App. 1995).
O'Bryan v. Commonwealth, 920 S.W.2d 529 (Ky. 1996).
Adams v. Commonwealth, 46 S.W.3d 572 (Ky. Ct. App. 2000).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(4)(e) — 3 cases
Cornelison v. Commonwealth, 52 S.W.3d 570 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(4) provides a comprehensive scheme of escalating penalties to be imposed on individuals who engage in the inherently dangerous activity of driving while under the influence of alcohol.”
Commonwealth v. Raines, 847 S.W.2d 724 (Ky. 1993).
Botkin v. Commonwealth, 890 S.W.2d 292 (Ky. 1994).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(5) — 20 cases
Ballinger v. Commonwealth, 459 S.W.3d 349 (Ky. 2015). “1988), a case in which the Court of Appeals construed an earlier version of KRS 189A.010 as providing for a “conviction-to-conviction” enhancement scheme.”
Cornelison v. Commonwealth, 52 S.W.3d 570 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(4) provides a comprehensive scheme of escalating penalties to be imposed on individuals who engage in the inherently dangerous activity of driving while under the influence of alcohol.”
Commonwealth v. Gaitherwright, 70 S.W.3d 411 (Ky. 2002). “Effective October 1, 2000, KRS 189A.010 was amended to provide that “[rjefusing to submit to any test or tests of one’s blood, breath or urine requested by an officer having reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating or in physical control of a motor vehicle in…”
Commonwealth v. Hernandez-Gonzalez, 72 S.W.3d 914 (Ky. 2002).
Commonwealth v. Brown, 560 S.W.3d 873 (Ky. Ct. App. 2018).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(5)(A) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(5)(a) — 15 cases
Commonwealth v. Gaitherwright, 70 S.W.3d 411 (Ky. 2002). “Effective October 1, 2000, KRS 189A.010 was amended to provide that “[rjefusing to submit to any test or tests of one’s blood, breath or urine requested by an officer having reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating or in physical control of a motor vehicle in…”
State v. James Denelsbeck(075170), 137 A.3d 462 (N.J. 2016).
Commonwealth v. Green, 194 S.W.3d 277 (Ky. 2006).
Ballinger v. Commonwealth, 459 S.W.3d 349 (Ky. 2015). “1988), a case in which the Court of Appeals construed an earlier version of KRS 189A.010 as providing for a “conviction-to-conviction” enhancement scheme.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(5)(b) — 5 cases
Jones v. Commonwealth, 279 S.W.3d 522 (Ky. 2009).
Commonwealth v. Hernandez-Gonzalez, 72 S.W.3d 914 (Ky. 2002).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(5)(c) — 8 cases
Parson v. Commonwealth, 144 S.W.3d 775 (Ky. 2004).
Commonwealth v. Lamberson, 304 S.W.3d 72 (Ky. Ct. App. 2010).
James K. Murphy v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 431 S.W.3d 428 (Ky. 2014).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(5)(d) — 12 cases
Jones v. Commonwealth, 279 S.W.3d 522 (Ky. 2009).
Rice v. Commonwealth, 492 S.W.3d 563 (Ky. 2016).
Ballinger v. Commonwealth, 459 S.W.3d 349 (Ky. 2015). “1988), a case in which the Court of Appeals construed an earlier version of KRS 189A.010 as providing for a “conviction-to-conviction” enhancement scheme.”
Commonwealth v. Lamberson, 201 S.W.3d 497 (Ky. Ct. App. 2006).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(5)(e) — 3 cases
Fulcher v. Commonwealth, 149 S.W.3d 363 (Ky. 2004).
Ballinger v. Commonwealth, 459 S.W.3d 349 (Ky. 2015). “1988), a case in which the Court of Appeals construed an earlier version of KRS 189A.010 as providing for a “conviction-to-conviction” enhancement scheme.”
Commonwealth v. Beard, 275 S.W.3d 205 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(6) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 136 S.W.3d 442 (Ky. 2004). “On January 25, 2002, Respondent, Joshua Reynolds, was charged with DUI under KRS 189A.010. On February 12, 2002, Reynolds moved the trial court to dismiss the charges because the Commonwealth charged him under subsection (5)(a), which is not the charging subsection but rather…”
Lay v. Commonwealth, 207 S.W.3d 18 (Ky. Ct. App. 2006).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(7) — 4 cases
Dedic v. Commonwealth, 920 S.W.2d 878 (Ky. 1996).
Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 136 S.W.3d 442 (Ky. 2004). “On January 25, 2002, Respondent, Joshua Reynolds, was charged with DUI under KRS 189A.010. On February 12, 2002, Reynolds moved the trial court to dismiss the charges because the Commonwealth charged him under subsection (5)(a), which is not the charging subsection but rather…”
Skeans v. Commonwealth, 912 S.W.2d 455 (Ky. Ct. App. 1995).
Adams v. Commonwealth, 46 S.W.3d 572 (Ky. Ct. App. 2000).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(8) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(a) — 2 cases
Commonwealth v. House, 295 S.W.3d 825 (Ky. 2009).
Commonwealth v. Rhodes, 949 S.W.2d 621 (Ky. Ct. App. 1996).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(l) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(l)(a) — 21 cases
Love v. Commonwealth, 55 S.W.3d 816 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(1) stated in pertinent part: A person shall not operate or be in physical control of a motor vehicle anywhere in this state: (a) While the alcohol concentration in his blood or breath is 0.”
Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 136 S.W.3d 442 (Ky. 2004). “On January 25, 2002, Respondent, Joshua Reynolds, was charged with DUI under KRS 189A.010. On February 12, 2002, Reynolds moved the trial court to dismiss the charges because the Commonwealth charged him under subsection (5)(a), which is not the charging subsection but rather…”
Commonwealth v. Wirth, 936 S.W.2d 78 (Ky. 1996).
Commonwealth v. Mattingly, 98 S.W.3d 865 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003).
Hudson v. Commonwealth, 202 S.W.3d 17 (Ky. 2006). “OPINION OF THE COURT On January 18, 2005, a Montgomery Circuit Court jury convicted Appellant, Emory Hudson, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”), fourth offense, KRS 189A.010(1), (5)(d), (ll)(d), a class D Felony, and of being a persistent…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(l)(b) — 8 cases
Love v. Commonwealth, 55 S.W.3d 816 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(1) stated in pertinent part: A person shall not operate or be in physical control of a motor vehicle anywhere in this state: (a) While the alcohol concentration in his blood or breath is 0.”
Hudson v. Commonwealth, 202 S.W.3d 17 (Ky. 2006). “OPINION OF THE COURT On January 18, 2005, a Montgomery Circuit Court jury convicted Appellant, Emory Hudson, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”), fourth offense, KRS 189A.010(1), (5)(d), (ll)(d), a class D Felony, and of being a persistent…”
Commonwealth v. Gaitherwright, 70 S.W.3d 411 (Ky. 2002). “Effective October 1, 2000, KRS 189A.010 was amended to provide that “[rjefusing to submit to any test or tests of one’s blood, breath or urine requested by an officer having reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating or in physical control of a motor vehicle in…”
Commonwealth v. Wirth, 936 S.W.2d 78 (Ky. 1996).
Lopez v. Commonwealth, 173 S.W.3d 905 (Ky. 2005).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(l)(c) — 4 cases
Beaty v. Commonwealth, 125 S.W.3d 196 (Ky. 2003).
Kidd v. Commonwealth, 146 S.W.3d 400 (Ky. Ct. App. 2004).
Leatherman v. Commonwealth, 357 S.W.3d 518 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011).
Epperson v. Commonwealth, 437 S.W.3d 157 (Ky. Ct. App. 2014).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(l)(d) — 2 cases
Epperson v. Commonwealth, 437 S.W.3d 157 (Ky. Ct. App. 2014).
Lopez v. Commonwealth, 173 S.W.3d 905 (Ky. 2005).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(l)(e) — 7 cases
Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 136 S.W.3d 442 (Ky. 2004). “On January 25, 2002, Respondent, Joshua Reynolds, was charged with DUI under KRS 189A.010. On February 12, 2002, Reynolds moved the trial court to dismiss the charges because the Commonwealth charged him under subsection (5)(a), which is not the charging subsection but rather…”
Commonwealth v. Howard, 969 S.W.2d 700 (Ky. 1998).
Cornelison v. Commonwealth, 52 S.W.3d 570 (Ky. 2001). “KRS 189A.010(4) provides a comprehensive scheme of escalating penalties to be imposed on individuals who engage in the inherently dangerous activity of driving while under the influence of alcohol.”
Greene v. Commonwealth, 244 S.W.3d 128 (Ky. Ct. App. 2008).
Perkins v. Commonwealth, 511 S.W.3d 380 (Ky. Ct. App. 2016).
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(l)(f) — 1 case
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 189A.010(ll)(e) — 1 case
Commonwealth v. Gaitherwright, 70 S.W.3d 411 (Ky. 2002). “Effective October 1, 2000, KRS 189A.010 was amended to provide that “[rjefusing to submit to any test or tests of one’s blood, breath or urine requested by an officer having reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating or in physical control of a motor vehicle in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.