Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 66.220 (2026)

Repealed, 1996

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Proof required to obtain approval of county, city, or taxing district bonds or obligations. History: Repealed 1996 Ky. Acts ch. 280, sec. 30, effective July 15, 1996. -- Repealed and reenacted 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 476, Pt. V, sec. 297, effective July 13, 1990. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. sec. 186c-7.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1943–1957 · leading case: City of Hickman v. First Nat. Bk. of New York, 211 S.W.2d 801 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of Hickman v. First Nat. Bk. of New York, 211 S.W.2d 801 (Ky. Ct. App. 1948). “Chapter 22, Acts of 1932, now KRS 66.220. At that lime there was a presumption of validity, and the party .”

Stith v. Bd. of Educ., Etc., 169 S.W.2d 600 (Ky. Ct. App. 1943). “’ ’ It would appear from the foregoing quotation from the record that the Board is attempting to do indirectly what we said it could not do directly; namely, refinance a part of the indebtedness incurred by it in advancing money to the Corporation for the reconstruction of the…”

Rivers v. City of Owensboro, 287 S.W.2d 151 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). “210 and KRS 66.220, providing for court approval of.”

Cramer v. City of Catlettsburg, 300 S.W.2d 555 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957). · cites it 2× “The city’s answer and proof conformed with the requirements of KRS 66.220. The pleadings set forth each year’s anticipated revenue and the amount expended for each year.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.