Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 76
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 76.260 (2026)

Repealed, 1962

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Classification of land in designated area -- Benefit rolls -- Notice to be published -- Objections -- Hearings. History: Repealed 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 1. -- Created 1956 Ky. Acts ch. 60, sec.1(9) and (10).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1958–2020 · leading case: Long Run Baptist Ass'n v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Metro. Sewer Dist., 775 S.W.2d 520 (Ky. Ct. App. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Long Run Baptist Ass'n v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Metro. Sewer Dist., 775 S.W.2d 520 (Ky. Ct. App. 1989). “2d 378 (1958), where property owners argued that KRS 76.260 (which was later repealed) was unconstitutional because it established a conclusive presumption that all land within a designated surface drainage improvement area would receive some benefit.”
Curtis v. Louisville & Jefferson Cnty. Metro. Sewer Dist., 311 S.W.2d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). · cites it 3× “255; after the necessary approvals have been obtained and all objections have been determined, the land in the improvement area is to be divided into four classes, according to the degree of benefit, and assessments for the cost of the improvement are to be levied on the basis…”
Curtis v. Louisville & Jefferson Co. Met. Sew. Dist., 311 S.W.2d 378 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958). · cites it 3× “255; after the necessary approvals have been obtained and all objections have been determined, the land in the improvement area is to be divided into four classes, according to the degree of benefit, and assessments for the cost of the improvement are to be levied on the basis…”
Sanitation Dist. 1 v. Daniel Louis Weinel (Ky. Ct. App. 2020). “In Curtis, the Court was addressing the constitutionality of former KRS 76.260, which established a presumption that all land within the designated improvement area will receive some benefit and, therefore, is subject to assessment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.