Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 78.780 (2026)

Repealed, 2021

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Administration of systems by board of trustees of state system. History: Repealed 2020 Ky. Acts ch. 79, sec. 44, effective April 1, 2021. -- Amended 2000 Ky. Acts ch. 385, sec. 38, effective July 14, 2000. -- Amended 1992 Ky. Acts ch. 240, sec. 61, effective July 14, 1992. -- Amended 1990 Ky. Acts ch. 489, sec. 7, effective July 13, 1990. -- Amended 1988 Ky. Acts ch. 349, sec. 39, effective July 15, 1988. -- Amended 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 186, sec. 23, effective July 15, 1980. -- Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 321, secs. 37 and 40. -- Amended 1972 Ky. Acts ch. 116, sec. 71. -- Amended 1962 Ky. Acts ch. 31, sec. 22. -- Amended 1960 Ky. Acts ch. 165, Pt. III, sec. 2. -- Created 1958 Ky. Acts ch. 167, sec. 28. Legislative Research Commission Note. Although this section is included in Acts 1980, ch. 186, the proposed change was deleted by committee amendment.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2021 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Kentucky Ret. Sys., 396 S.W.3d 833 (Ky. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Commonwealth v. Kentucky Ret. Sys., 396 S.W.3d 833 (Ky. 2013). “645(1); KRS 78.780. This case began when the employees filed an action in Franklin Circuit Court seeking a declaration that KRS 61.”

Kentucky Ret. Sys. v. Ronald Ashcraft (Ky. 2018). · cites it 2× “KRS 78.780(1). Although CERS is created through KRS Chapter 78, KRS 78.”

City of Fort Wright, Kentucky v. Bd. of Trs. of the Kentucky Ret. Sys. (Ky. 2021). “Our review proceeds as a matter of statutory interpretation: whether the Board’s authorized investments are controlled broadly by KRS 61.”

— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 78.780(1) — 1 case

Kentucky Ret. Sys. v. Ronald Ashcraft (Ky. 2018). “KRS 78.780(1). Although CERS is created through KRS Chapter 78, KRS 78.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.