Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 86
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 86.240 (2026)

Repealed, 1980

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Vacancies in city offices. History: Repealed 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 235, sec. 20, effective July 15, 1980. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 3551, 3552.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1951–1952 · leading case: Cawood v. Hensley, 247 S.W.2d 27 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cawood v. Hensley, 247 S.W.2d 27 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). · cites it 4× “Thus, it is made uncertain as a matter of law whether Cawood’s appointment was (1) to fill a vacancy “in any elective city office * * * subject to the provisions of ■§ 152 of the Constitution”, KRS 86.240, which would be until a special election could be had to fill the…”
Commonwealth ex rel. Funk v. Huntsman, 237 S.W.2d 876 (Ky. Ct. App. 1951). · cites it 2× ““Section 86.240 provides that a vacancy in an elective city office ‘shall be filled by the City Council subject to the provisions of Section 152 of the Constitution.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 86.240(1) — 1 case
Cawood v. Hensley, 247 S.W.2d 27 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). “Thus, it is made uncertain as a matter of law whether Cawood’s appointment was (1) to fill a vacancy “in any elective city office * * * subject to the provisions of ■§ 152 of the Constitution”, KRS 86.240, which would be until a special election could be had to fill the…”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 86.240(2) — 1 case
Cawood v. Hensley, 247 S.W.2d 27 (Ky. Ct. App. 1952). “Thus, it is made uncertain as a matter of law whether Cawood’s appointment was (1) to fill a vacancy “in any elective city office * * * subject to the provisions of ■§ 152 of the Constitution”, KRS 86.240, which would be until a special election could be had to fill the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.