Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 92.340 (2026)

Liability of city of home rule class for violation of KRS 92.330 or

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

91A.030(13) -- Remedies. If, in any city of the home rule class, any city tax revenue is expended for a purpose other than that for which the tax was levied or the license fee imposed, each officer, agent or employee who, by a refusal to act, could have prevented the expenditure, and the members of the city legislative body who voted for the expenditure, shall be jointly and severally liable to the city for the amount so expended. The amount may be recovered of them in an action upon their bonds, or personally. The city attorney shall prosecute to recovery all such actions. If he fails to do so for six (6) months after the money has been expended, any taxpayer may prosecute such action for the use and benefit of the city. A recovery under this subsection shall not bar a criminal prosecution. Any indebtedness contracted by a city of the home rule class in violation of this subsection or of KRS 92.330 or 91A.030(13) shall be void, the contract shall not be enforceable by the person with whom made, the city shall never assume the same, and money paid under any such contract may be recovered back by the city. Effective: January 1, 2015 History: Amended 2014 Ky. Acts ch. 92, sec. 101, effective January 1, 2015. -- Amended 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 63, sec. 3. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, sec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 3175, 4281u-2, 4281u-6. Legislative Research Commission Note (1982). A technical correction has been made in this section by the Reviser of Statutes pursuant to KRS 7.136.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2026 · leading case: Catchen v. City of Park Hills, 356 S.W.3d 131 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011).
Catchen v. City of Park Hills, 356 S.W.3d 131 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “Additionally, Catehen’s reliance upon KRS 92.340 4 to confer standing is misplaced.”
Scalise v. Sewell-Scheuermann, 566 S.W.3d 539 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “KRS 92.340. These statutes were preceded by somewhat similar statutes in the 1894 Laws of Kentucky.”
Michael Scalise v. Suzette Sewell-Scheuermann (Ky. 2018). · cites it 18× “KRS 92.340. These statutes were preceded by somewhat similar statutes in the 1894 Laws of Kentucky.”
Suzette Sewell-Scheuermann v. Michael Scalise (Ky. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 7× “330 and KRS 92.340, and Section 180 of the Kentucky Constitution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.