Ky. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 94
Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 94.294 (2026)

Repealed, 1980

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Catchline at repeal: Complete or "stage" street improvements -- Limitation on frequency of assessments. History: Repealed 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 234, sec. 11, effective July 15, 1980. -- Created 1950 Ky. Acts ch. 165, sec. 5.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1953–1959 · leading case: Bradshaw v. Yager, 265 S.W.2d 486 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bradshaw v. Yager, 265 S.W.2d 486 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “KRS 94.294(2). After the effec-" tive date of the Act, the City, on April 10, 1950, passed another resolution designating the streets to be improved and declaring the improvement to be a necessity.”
City of Hazard v. Main Street Realty Co., 262 S.W.2d 87 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). · cites it 2× “Under KRS 94.294 it is provided that when one complete street improvement has been made at the cost of abutting property owners, no assessment -against property owners for “further improvement” of that street, other than a widening project, may be made for a period of 15 years.”
Rivers v. City of Owensboro, 287 S.W.2d 151 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956). · cites it 2× “It was agreed that the project would be designated a “complete improvement” within the meaning of KRS 94.294, but a reservation would he made in the ordinance so as not to prevent the installation of sewer lines, water lines or sidewalk improvements within the 15-year-period…”
Vasseur v. City of Calvert City, 320 S.W.2d 308 (Ky. Ct. App. 1959). · cites it 2× “KRS 94.294 authorizes a city to make and finance a street improvement by “stages”.”
— Ky. Rev. Stat. § 94.294(2) — 1 case
Bradshaw v. Yager, 265 S.W.2d 486 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953). “KRS 94.294(2). After the effec-" tive date of the Act, the City, on April 10, 1950, passed another resolution designating the streets to be improved and declaring the improvement to be a necessity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.