Kentucky Revised Statutes

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 95.867 (2026)

Members' contributions -- Director of finance to deduct

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KY-LRCapps.legislature.ky.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Each active member shall contribute a sum equal to eight percent (8%) of current salary. The director of finance of the city is hereby authorized to deduct such amount from the salary of each active member in semimonthly installments. This contribution shall be made as deduction from salary, notwithstanding that the salary paid in cash to such member may be reduced thereby below the established statutory rate. Every member of the fund shall be deemed to consent and agree to the deduction from salary as herein provided, and shall receipt for his full salary, and payment to such member of salary less such deduction shall constitute a full and complete discharge and acquittance of all claims and demands whatsoever for the services rendered by such member during the period covered by such payment, except as to the benefits herein provided. History: Amended 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 396, sec. 7. -- Created 1956 Ky. Acts ch. 16, sec. 17, effective July 1, 1956.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1975–1995 · leading case: City of Covington v. Bd. of Trs. of the Policemen's & Firefighters' Ret. Fund, 903 S.W.2d 517 (Ky. 1995).
City of Covington v. Bd. of Trs. of the Policemen's & Firefighters' Ret. Fund, 903 S.W.2d 517 (Ky. 1995). · cites it 2× “However, none of the Appellees contributed a portion of their salary to the fund for the unused sick and vacation time upon retirement, but contend that they have offered to do so as provided in KRS 95.867. *521 On this appeal, the Appellants contend that offensive collateral…”
Policeman's & Fireman's Ret. Fund of Ashland v. Richardson, 522 S.W.2d 452 (Ky. Ct. App. 1975). “KRS 95.867 requires the director of finance of the city to deduct from the current salary of each policeman the designated percentagé contribution to the retirement fund.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.