Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 12:75 (2026)

Repealed by Acts 2014, No. 328, §5, eff. Jan. 1, 2015.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§75.  Repealed by Acts 2014, No. 328, §5, eff. Jan. 1, 2015.

Acts 1968, No. 105, §1.  Amended by Acts 1970, No. 50, §4, emerg. eff. June 18, 1970, at 5:05 P.M.; Acts 1987, No. 62, §3, eff. June 11, 1987; Acts 1988, No. 173, §3, eff. June 29, 1988; Acts 1988, No. 455, §1, eff. July 10, 1988; Acts 1993, No. 983, §1, eff. June 25, 1993; Acts 2014, No. 328, §5, eff. Jan. 1, 2015.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1971–2013 · leading case: Guidry v. Gulf Coast Coil Tubing, 24 So. 3d 1019 (La. Ct. App. 2009).
Guidry v. Gulf Coast Coil Tubing, 24 So. 3d 1019 (La. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 5× “R.S. 12:75 provides as follows: § 75. Voting of shareholders and bondholders A.”
De Felice v. Garon, 395 So. 2d 658 (La. 1981). · cites it 6× “LSA-R.S. 12:75 C(3). The only other devices for granting another the right to vote stock are (1) a voting trust, which was not validly established here, and (2) pledge with transfer of the stock to the pledgee.”
Muslow v. AG Edwards & Sons, Inc., 509 So. 2d 1012 (La. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Muslow has made no showing that any right granted by LSA-R.S. 12:75 [1] or LSA-R.S. 12:103 [2] (such as the right to vote or inspect corporate records) has been denied to him, or that he was entitled to a mandatory injunction.”
Succession of Cole, 108 So. 3d 240 (La. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “R.S. 12:75(E) 5 authorizes Jim to vote the succession shares.”
Schexnayder v. Yolande Schexnayder & Son, Inc., 119 So. 3d 624 (La. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 3× “R.S. 12:75; Pollock v. Pollock Engineering Co.”
Theodore Brennan v. Owen Brennan, Jr., et a, 548 F. App'x 264 (5th Cir. 2013). · cites it 3× “R.S. 12:75 A. Under § 75 A, if shares have not been redeemed, the owner may vote them.”
Brennan v. Brennan, 945 F. Supp. 2d 704 (E.D. La. 2013). · cites it 2× “See La.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 12:75; La.Rev.Stat. Ann.”
Chisom v. Edwards, 690 F. Supp. 1524 (E.D. La. 1988). · cites it 2× “, La.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 12:75(1) (West 1969) (generally providing for plurality-vote at-large elections for corporate directors).”
Hebert v. Stansbury, 248 So. 2d 873 (La. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 3× “” The requirements for a valid proxy are set forth in LSA-R.S. 12:75, subd. C(l) : “A shareholder shall have the right to cast his vote either in person or, subject to the following provisions, by proxy duly authorized in writing, signed by the shareholder and filed with the…”
Foreman v. Hines, 314 So. 2d 460 (La. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2× “In support of their petition plaintiffs showed that they were the holders of record of 75 shares and pursuant to R.S. 12:75, subd. A were entitled to vote their shares at the stockholders' meeting.”
Pollock v. Pollock Eng'g Co., Inc., 365 So. 2d 1186 (La. Ct. App. 1978). “LSA-R.S. 12:75 and 12:77. Under these provisions, Betty Bickers Pollock is not entitled to any rights of a shareholder.”
Emile M. Babst Co., Inc. v. Com. Enter., Inc., 274 So. 2d 742 (La. Ct. App. 1973). · cites it 4× “NOTES [1] According to plaintiff, LSA-R.S. 12:75 (D) would read: "A person whose shares are pledged shall be entitled to vote them, until and unless the said shares have been transferred on the books of the corporation to one who acquires said shares through the foreclosure of…”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 12:75(1) — 1 case
Chisom v. Edwards, 690 F. Supp. 1524 (E.D. La. 1988). “, La.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 12:75(1) (West 1969) (generally providing for plurality-vote at-large elections for corporate directors).”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 12:75(A) — 1 case
Guidry v. Gulf Coast Coil Tubing, 24 So. 3d 1019 (La. Ct. App. 2009). “R.S. 12:75 provides as follows: § 75. Voting of shareholders and bondholders A.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 12:75(D) — 3 cases
De Felice v. Garon, 395 So. 2d 658 (La. 1981). “LSA-R.S. 12:75 C(3). The only other devices for granting another the right to vote stock are (1) a voting trust, which was not validly established here, and (2) pledge with transfer of the stock to the pledgee.”
Emile M. Babst Co., Inc. v. Com. Enter., Inc., 274 So. 2d 742 (La. Ct. App. 1973). “NOTES [1] According to plaintiff, LSA-R.S. 12:75 (D) would read: "A person whose shares are pledged shall be entitled to vote them, until and unless the said shares have been transferred on the books of the corporation to one who acquires said shares through the foreclosure of…”
Smart v. Woodard, 441 So. 2d 460 (La. Ct. App. 1983).
— La. Rev. Stat. § 12:75(E) — 1 case
Succession of Cole, 108 So. 3d 240 (La. Ct. App. 2012). “R.S. 12:75(E) 5 authorizes Jim to vote the succession shares.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 12:75(I) — 1 case
Coleman v. Marzullo, 296 So. 2d 437 (La. Ct. App. 1974).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.