Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 24:253 (2026)

Incorporation of current legislation; procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§253. Incorporation of current legislation; procedure

           In preparing the printer's copy provided for in R.S. 24:252, the Louisiana State Law Institute shall not alter the sense, meaning or effect of any act of the legislature, but it may:

           (1) Renumber and rearrange sections or parts of sections;

           (2) Transfer sections or divide sections so as to give to distinct subject matters a separate section number, but without changing the meaning;

           (3) Insert or change the wording of headnotes;

           (4) Change reference numbers to agree with renumbered chapters or sections;

           (5) Substitute the proper section or chapter number for the terms "this act", "the preceding section" and the like;

           (6) Strike out figures where they are merely a repetition of written words and vice-versa;

           (7) Change capitalization for the purpose of uniformity;

           (8) Correct manifest typographical and grammatical errors, and

           (9) Make any other purely formal or clerical changes in keeping with the purpose of the revision.

           The Institute shall omit all titles of acts, all enacting, resolving, and repealing clauses, all appropriation measures, all temporary statutes, all declarations of emergency, and all validity, declaration of policy, and construction clauses, except when the retention thereof is necessary to preserve the full meaning and intent of the law. Whenever any validity, declaration of policy, or construction clause is omitted, proper notation of the omission shall be made.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40 cases, 1966–2018 · leading case: Foil v. Comm'r, 92 T.C. 376 (Tax Ct. 1989).
Foil v. Comm'r, 92 T.C. 376 (Tax Ct. 1989). · cites it 4× “Any deductions from an employee’s gross income, during the highest thirty-six consecutive months of employment prior to retirement, for purposes of tax sheltering said deductions under the provisions of this Section shall be included in the base from which retirement benefits…”
Theriot v. Terrebonne Par. Police Jury, 436 So. 2d 515 (La. 1983). “On authority of R.S. 24:253, the provisions were transferred and redesignated R.”
Louisiana Power & Light v. Par. Sch. Bd., 597 So. 2d 578 (La. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “R.S. 24:253, pertinent to the powers of the Louisiana State Law Institute, reads: In preparing the printer's copy provided for in R.”
Hoag v. State Ex Rel. Kennedy, 836 So. 2d 207 (La. Ct. App. 2002). “R.S. 24:253. [11] Cf. The Sloop Active v.”
Preferred Inv. Corp. v. Neucere, 592 So. 2d 889 (La. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “5 and R.S. 24:253. [3] This statute was redesignated as R.”
Wiley v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 430 So. 2d 1016 (La. Ct. App. 1982). “1 Changed from "form" to "from" on authority of R.S. 24:253. (emphasis ours) Hence, under Louisiana law, an employer must show good cause for discharging an employee engaged for a fixed term.”
Royal v. Cook, 984 So. 2d 156 (La. Ct. App. 2008). “R.S. 24:253; such comments are not intended to be considered as part of the law and are not enacted into law by virtue of their inclusion in a particular Act.”
Wallace v. LeBlanc, 255 So. 3d 613 (La. Ct. App. 2018). “R.S. 24:253. Those inmates previously eligible to earn fifteen days of good time per month were allowed to earn thirty days, while those that were eligible to earn twenty-five days a month, were allowed to earn fifty days under the double good time statute as La.”
Ciaccio v. Cazayoux, 519 So. 2d 799 (La. Ct. App. 1987). “2 on the authority of LSA-R.S. 24:253. LSA-C.C. art. 2315.1, which addresses the survival action, provides: A.”
Cooper v. Huddy, 581 So. 2d 723 (La. Ct. App. 1991). “A(1)(e). [11] By Acts 1986, No. 211, § 2, Civil Code Article 2315 was amended, severing and transferring the provisions dealing with wrongful death actions to newly enacted Civil Code Art.”
Holmes v. Baton Rouge Water Works Co., 558 So. 2d 629 (La. Ct. App. 1990). “R.S. 24:253, subsection B as contained in Act 926 was redesignated as subsection C.”
Thomas v. Thomas, 440 So. 2d 879 (La. Ct. App. 1983). “Both versions of Article 160 have been codified in the Revised Statutes under the authority of LSA-R.S. 24:253. Only the version of Article 160 enacted by Act 580 terminates permanent alimony upon a finding of open concubinage.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.