La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 31:149 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CHAPTER 8. MINERAL RIGHTS IN LAND ACQUIRED OR EXPROPRIATED

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1976–2016 · leading case: Cohort Ener. v. Caddo-Bossier Parishes Port, 852 So. 2d 1174 (La. Ct. App. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cohort Ener. v. Caddo-Bossier Parishes Port, 852 So. 2d 1174 (La. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 17× “R.S. 31:149, two provisions in our law dealing with imprescriptible mineral interests.”
Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Heck, 407 So. 2d 770 (La. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2× “See LSA-R.S. 31:149. [2] According to LSA-R.S.”
Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States, 365 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 2004). “R.S. § 31:149. 18 . See United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co.”
Anadarko Prod. Co. v. Caddo Par. Sch. Bd., 455 So. 2d 699 (La. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Former LRS 9:5806 B, now incorporated into LRS 31:149, was enacted by Act 278 of 1958 to make imprescriptible mineral servitudes that were created when landowners reserved mineral rights in a sale of land to school boards and other named agencies of the state.”
Waterfowl Ltd. Liab. Co. v. United States, 473 F.3d 135 (5th Cir. 2006). “2d 187 (1973) (quoting the statute); see also La. Rev. Stat. § 31:149 (current successor to Act 315).”
Cent. Pines Land Co. v. United States, 274 F.3d 881 (5th Cir. 2001). “La.Rev.Stat. § 31:149. 7 . Jurisdiction in the district court was based on 28 U.”
Par. of St. Charles v. R.H. Creager, Inc., 55 So. 3d 884 (La. Ct. App. 2010). “Charles Parish subject to a reservation of mineral rights in accordance with LSA-R.S. 31:149. The consent judgment also reserved the defendants’ rights to |3compensation, attorney’s fees, costs, and legal interest resulting from the expropriation.”
Bd. of Com'rs of La. v. All Taxpayers Etc., 360 So. 2d 863 (La. 1978). “y declared to be performing a public function and to be a body politic and political subdivision of the state of Louisiana as defined in Article VI, Section 44 of the Louisiana Constitution, with all rights, powers, and authority granted to political subdivisions of the state…”
Peevy v. State, Dep't of Highways, 340 So. 2d 642 (La. Ct. App. 1976). “9:5806, repealed by Act 50 of 1974 and reenacted as R.S. 31:149) and that a “standard vehicular approach” from the highway to plaintiffs’ remaining property was required to be constructed by the State.”
Heirs of Viator v. Tri-Par. Investors, Ltd., 618 So. 2d 36 (La. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “R.S. 31:149, should be applied retroactively.”
Reilly v. State, 533 So. 2d 1341 (La. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “528; and LSA-R.S. 31:149. These acts, and as amended by subsequent legislation, are now codified in Articles 149 through 151 of the Louisiana Mineral Code.”
Greater New Orleans Expressway Comm'n v. Bd. of Tax Appeals, 681 So. 2d 957 (La. Ct. App. 1996). “hereby declared to be performing a public function and to be a body politic and political subdivision of the state of Louisiana as defined in Art VI, Section 44 of the Louisiana Constitution, with all rights, powers, and authority granted to political subdivisions of the state…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.