Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes
La. Rev. Stat. § 31:16 (2026)
The basic mineral rights that may be created by a landowner are the mineral servitude, the mineral royalty, and the mineral lease. This enumeration does not exclude the creation of other mineral rights by a landowner. Mineral rights are real rights and are subject either to the prescription of nonuse for ten years or to special rules of law governing the term of their existence.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
LA-LEGlegis.la.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§16. Basic mineral rights; status as real rights
The basic mineral rights that may be created by a landowner are the mineral servitude, the mineral royalty, and the mineral lease. This enumeration does not exclude the creation of other mineral rights by a landowner. Mineral rights are real rights and are subject either to the prescription of nonuse for ten years or to special rules of law governing the term of their existence.
Acts 1974, No. 50, §1, eff. Jan. 1, 1975.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 59
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: Frank C. Minvielle, L.L.C. v. IMC Global Operations, Inc., 380 F. Supp. 2d 755 (W.D. La. 2004).
Frank C. Minvielle, L.L.C. v. IMC Global Operations, Inc., 380 F. Supp. 2d 755 (W.D. La. 2004). “” See La.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 31:16,:18; St. Charles Land Trust v.”
Grace Ranch, LLC v. BP Am. Prod. Co., 252 So. 3d 546 (La. Ct. App. 2018). “R.S. 31:16 stating that mineral rights are real rights, that status is reserved to the mineral lessee and not the mineral lessor.”
Wagoner v. Chevron USA Inc., 55 So. 3d 12 (La. Ct. App. 2010). “R.S. 31:16 provides: The basic mineral rights that may be created by a landowner are the mineral servitude, the mineral royalty, and the mineral lease.”
Quality Env't Processes, Inc. v. IP Petroleum Co., 219 So. 3d 349 (La. Ct. App. 2017). “R.S. 31:16; La. R.S. 31:80. A mineral royalty is a real right and is also classified as an incorporable immovable whose transfer or conveyance requires all formalities prescribed for the transfer of any other immovable, including that transfer or ownership thereof must be…”
Texaco Inc. v. Louisiana Land & Expl. Co., 136 B.R. 658 (M.D. La. 1992). “” LSA-R.S. 31:16. 2. The mineral lease is a contract “by which the lessee is granted the right to explore for and produce minerals.”
Alford v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., 13 F. Supp. 3d 581 (E.D. La. 2014). “” La.Rev.Stat. § 31:16. As explained above, the 1960 agreement is not a mineral servitude.”
Hoover Tree Farm, L.L.C. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co., 63 So. 3d 159 (La. Ct. App. 2011). “R.S. 31:16. “Mineral rights are real rights.”
Succession of Doll v. Doll, 593 So. 2d 1239 (La. 1992). “The mineral lease is a contract by which the lessee is granted the right to explore for and produce minerals. La.Rev.Stat.Ann.”
Campbell v. Pasternack Holding Co., Inc., 625 So. 2d 477 (La. 1993). “La.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 31:16. They are conceptually analogous to real rights inherent in predial servitudes.”
Duck v. Hunt Oil Co., 134 So. 3d 114 (La. Ct. App. 2014). “R.S. 31:16. Quoting Hoover Tree Farm, L.L.”
Sketoe v. Exxon Co., USA, 188 F.3d 596 (5th Cir. 1999). “See La.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 31:16,: 18; St. Charles Land Trust v.”
Dupree v. Oil, Gas & Other Minerals, 731 So. 2d 1067 (La. Ct. App. 1999). “R.S. 31:16. The landowners purchased the tract of land subject to a mineral servitude.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.