La. R.S. » RS
Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 37:779 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§779. Filing of administrative complaint or charge; appointment of committee to hear charge; quorum

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1979–2009 · leading case: Allen v. State Bd. of Dentistry, 543 So. 2d 908 (La. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allen v. State Bd. of Dentistry, 543 So. 2d 908 (La. 1989). · cites it 5× “R.S. 37:779 to contact patients and thus substantiate the charges made by former employees; and 4) Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding Allen was not denied his due process right to a fair hearing before an impartial tribunal.”
In Re Shiplov, 945 So. 2d 52 (La. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “R.S. 37:779 (Filing of administrative complaint or charge; appointment of committee to hear charge; quorum.”
Allen v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry, 531 So. 2d 787 (La. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 3× “R.S. 37:779 "The Board had no affirmative obligation to call Dr.”
Hughes v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry, 490 So. 2d 1097 (La. Ct. App. 1986). “Pursuant to LSA R.S. 37:779 [6] the charges made against Dr.”
Friedman v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry, 3 So. 3d 565 (La. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “R.S. 37:779(B). (Emphasis Ladded). The Board is vested with discretion as to the institution of disciplinary proceedings following an investigation.”
Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry v. DDS, 18 So. 3d 792 (La. Ct. App. 2009). “R.S. 37:779 B. DDS attempts to demonstrate his complete compliance with La.”
DePaula v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry, 377 So. 2d 866 (La. Ct. App. 1979). “As pointed out by the trial judge, the law applicable in this case is R.S. 37:779 which, in pertinent part, specifically provides: “The president [of the Board] shall designate the time and place of the hearing.”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 37:779(B) — 1 case
Friedman v. Louisiana State Bd. of Dentistry, 3 So. 3d 565 (La. Ct. App. 2009). “R.S. 37:779(B). (Emphasis Ladded). The Board is vested with discretion as to the institution of disciplinary proceedings following an investigation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.