Louisiana Revised Statutes & Codes

La. Rev. Stat. § 46:2140 (2026)

Law enforcement officers; duties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section LA-LEGlegis.la.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§2140. Law enforcement officers; duties

           A. If a law enforcement officer has reason to believe that a family or household member or dating partner has been abused and the abusing party is in violation of a temporary restraining order, a preliminary or permanent injunction, or a protective order issued pursuant to R.S. 9:361 et seq., R.S. 9:372, R.S. 46:2131 et seq., R.S. 46:2151, R.S. 46:2171 et seq., Children's Code Article 1564 et seq., Code of Civil Procedure Articles 3604 and 3607.1, or Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 30, 327.1, 335.1, 335.2, and 871.1, the officer shall immediately arrest the abusing party.

           B. If a law enforcement officer has reason to believe that a family or household member or dating partner has been abused, and the abusing party is not in violation of a restraining order, a preliminary or permanent injunction, or a protective order, the officer shall immediately use all reasonable means to prevent further abuse, including:

           (1) Arresting the abusive party with a warrant or without a warrant pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Article 213, if probable cause exists to believe that a felony has been committed by that person, whether or not the offense occurred in the officer's presence.

           (2) Arresting the abusive party in case of any misdemeanor crime which endangers the physical safety of the abused person whether or not the offense occurred in the presence of the officer. If there is no cause to believe there is impending danger, arresting the abusive party is at the officer's discretion.

           (3) Assisting the abused person in obtaining medical treatment necessitated by the battery; arranging for, or providing, or assisting in the procurement of transportation for the abused person to a place of shelter or safety.

           (4) Notifying the abused person of his right to initiate criminal or civil proceedings; the availability of the protective order, R.S. 46:2136; and the availability of community assistance for domestic violence victims.

           C.(1) When a law enforcement officer receives conflicting accounts of domestic abuse or dating violence, the officer shall evaluate each account separately to determine if one party was the predominant aggressor.

           (2) In determining if one party is the predominant aggressor, the law enforcement officer may consider any other relevant factors, but shall consider the following factors based upon his or her observation:

           (a) Evidence from complainants and other witnesses.

           (b) The extent of personal injuries received by each person.

           (c) Whether a person acted in self-defense.

           (d) An imminent threat of future injury to any of the parties.

           (e) Prior complaints of domestic abuse or dating violence, if that history can be reasonably ascertained by the officer.

           (f) The future welfare of any minors who are present at the scene.

           (g) The existence of a temporary restraining order, a preliminary or permanent injunction, or a protective order issued pursuant to R.S. 9:361 et seq., R.S. 9:372, R.S. 46:2131 et seq., R.S. 46:2151, R.S. 46:2171 et seq., Children's Code Article 1564 et seq., Code of Civil Procedure Articles 3604 and 3607.1, or Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 30, 327.1, 335.1, 335.2, and 871.1. The officer shall presume that the predominant aggressor is the person against whom the order was issued.

           (3)(a) If the officer determines that one person was the predominant aggressor in a felony offense, the officer shall arrest that person. The arrest shall be subject to the laws governing arrest, including the need for probable cause as otherwise provided by law.

           (b) If the officer determines that one person was the predominant aggressor in a misdemeanor offense, the officer shall arrest the predominant aggressor if there is reason to believe that there is impending danger or if the predominant aggressor is in violation of a temporary restraining order, a preliminary or permanent injunction, or a protective order issued pursuant to R.S. 9:361 et seq., R.S. 9:372, R.S. 46:2131 et seq., R.S. 46:2151, R.S. 46:2171 et seq., Children's Code Article 1564 et seq., Code of Civil Procedure Articles 3604 and 3607.1, or Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 30, 327.1, 335.1, 335.2, and 871.1. If there is no threat of impending danger or no violation of a temporary restraining order, a preliminary or permanent injunction, or a protective order, the officer may arrest the predominant aggressor at the officer's discretion, whether or not the offense occurred in the presence of the officer. An arrest pursuant to the provisions of this Subparagraph shall be subject to the laws governing arrest, including the need for probable cause as otherwise provided by law. The exceptions provided for in this Section shall apply.

           (4) As used in this Subsection:

           (a) "Dating violence" has the meaning as defined in R.S. 46:2151(C).

           (b) "Domestic abuse" has the meaning as defined in R.S. 46:2132(3).

           Acts 1985, No. 442, §1, eff. July 12, 1985; Acts 2003, No. 750, §6; Acts 2004, No. 882, §1; Acts 2014, No. 317, §3, eff. August 1, 2014; Acts 2015, No. 85, §1, eff. August 1, 2015.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1996–2014 · leading case: Wilson v. Town of Mamou, 972 So. 2d 461 (La. Ct. App. 2007).
Wilson v. Town of Mamou, 972 So. 2d 461 (La. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “The former statute provides that: "Any law enforcement officer reporting in good faith, exercising due care in the making of an arrest or providing assistance pursuant to the provisions of R.S. 46:2140 and 2141 shall have immunity from any civil liability that otherwise might be…”
Welborn v. 19th Jud. Dist. Court, 974 So. 2d 1 (La. 2008). “§ 46:2140. Consistent with its broader focus on "domestic violence" (as opposed to the "family violence" stated in the original Act), the 1982 amendment extended protection to include not only "family members," [2] but "household members" as well, which it defines as.”
Latiolais v. Guillory, 747 So. 2d 675 (La. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “R.S. 46:2140 of the act, which provides, in part: Whenever a law enforcement officer has reason to believe that a family or household member has been abused, the officer shall immediately use all reasonable means to prevent further abuse, including: .”
Phillips v. City of Crowley, 115 So. 3d 1240 (La. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 5× “R.S. 46:2140 sets forth the duty of police officers in a domestic abuse situation.”
Ardoin v. City of Mamou, 685 So. 2d 294 (La. Ct. App. 1996). “R.S. 46:2140 and 14:79, statutes which authorize the arrest of violators of restraining orders, instruct law enforcement officers to "use all reasonable means" in enforcing their provisions.”
State v. Baker, 902 So. 2d 1247 (La. Ct. App. 2005). “R.S. 46:2140 and, in particular, La. R.S.”
Floyd v. City of Carencro, 149 So. 3d 387 (La. Ct. App. 2014). “Louisiana Revised Statutes 46:2142 states: Any law enforcement officer reporting in good faith, exercising due care in the making of an arrest or providing assistance pursuant to the provisions of R.S. 46:2140 and 2141[ 2 ] shall have immunity from any civil liability that…”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 46:2140(2) — 1 case
Latiolais v. Guillory, 747 So. 2d 675 (La. Ct. App. 1999). “R.S. 46:2140 of the act, which provides, in part: Whenever a law enforcement officer has reason to believe that a family or household member has been abused, the officer shall immediately use all reasonable means to prevent further abuse, including: .”
— La. Rev. Stat. § 46:2140(A) — 1 case
Wilson v. Town of Mamou, 972 So. 2d 461 (La. Ct. App. 2007). “The former statute provides that: "Any law enforcement officer reporting in good faith, exercising due care in the making of an arrest or providing assistance pursuant to the provisions of R.S. 46:2140 and 2141 shall have immunity from any civil liability that otherwise might be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.