Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 10
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 10, § 969 (2026)

Powers and duties of the authority

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1983, c. 519, §6 (NEW). PL 1985, c. 344, §16 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2000 · leading case: Waterville Indus., Inc. v. Fin. Auth., 2000 ME 138 (Me. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Waterville Indus., Inc. v. Fin. Auth., 2000 ME 138 (Me. 2000). “When section 1005(4) was repealed, it was replaced by 10 M.R.S.A. § 969, which contained almost identical language.”
Harold D. Smith & Sons, Inc. v. Fin. Auth., 543 A.2d 814 (Me. 1988). · cites it 2× “” 10 M.R.S.A. § 969(26). The statute also provided that “the authority may employ a chief executive officer and other staff [and] .”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 10, § 969(26) — 1 case
Harold D. Smith & Sons, Inc. v. Fin. Auth., 543 A.2d 814 (Me. 1988). “” 10 M.R.S.A. § 969(26). The statute also provided that “the authority may employ a chief executive officer and other staff [and] .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.