Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 2-703 (2026)

Seller's remedies in general

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Where the buyer wrongfully rejects or revokes acceptance of goods or fails to make a payment due on or before delivery or repudiates with respect to a part or the whole, then with respect to any goods directly affected and, if the breach is of the whole contract (section 2‑612), then also with respect to the whole undelivered balance, the aggrieved seller may  
(1).  Withhold delivery of such goods;  
(2).  Stop delivery by any bailee as hereafter provided (section 2‑705);  
(3).  Proceed under section 2‑704 respecting goods still unidentified to the contract;  
(4).  Resell and recover damages as hereafter provided (section 2‑706);  
(5).  Recover damages for nonacceptance (section 2‑708) or in a proper case the price (section 2‑709);  
(6).  Cancel.  
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–2019 · leading case: Argus Mgmt. Corp. v. Pillsbury Co. (In Re Hillcrest Foods, Inc.), 40 B.R. 360 (Bankr. D. Me. 1984).
Argus Mgmt. Corp. v. Pillsbury Co. (In Re Hillcrest Foods, Inc.), 40 B.R. 360 (Bankr. D. Me. 1984). “See Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11, § 1-106(1) (1964).”
Passamaquoddy Wild Blueberry Co. v. Cherryfield Foods, Inc. (Me. Super. Ct 2019). · cites it 2× “11 M.R.S.A. § 2-703 U.C.C. cmt. 1 ("This section is an index section which gathers together in one convenient place all of the various remedies open to seller for any breach by a buyer.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 2-703(1) — 1 case
Argus Mgmt. Corp. v. Pillsbury Co. (In Re Hillcrest Foods, Inc.), 40 B.R. 360 (Bankr. D. Me. 1984). “See Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11, § 1-106(1) (1964).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.