Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 3-606 (2026)

Impairment of recourse or of collateral

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1993, c. 293, §A1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1991 · leading case: Maine Nat'l Bank v. Fontaine, 456 A.2d 1273 (Me. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maine Nat'l Bank v. Fontaine, 456 A.2d 1273 (Me. 1983). · cites it 2× “The defendant also argues that the justice erred in failing to give an instruction on whether or not, prior to Fon-taine cosigning the renewals of the note, the Bank had a duty to disclose to an accommodation party that it refused to submit the S.”
Poultry Processing, Inc. v. Mendelson, 584 A.2d 659 (Me. 1991). · cites it 2× “§ 9-207 is incorporated into the provisions of 11 M.R.S.A. § 3-606 makes no difference. The plaintiff has not breached that standard.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 3-606(l)(b) — 1 case
Poultry Processing, Inc. v. Mendelson, 584 A.2d 659 (Me. 1991). “§ 9-207 is incorporated into the provisions of 11 M.R.S.A. § 3-606 makes no difference. The plaintiff has not breached that standard.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.