Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 8-317 (2026)

Creditors' rights

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 625, §3 (RPR). PL 1997, c. 429, §B1 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1991–1991 · leading case: Bahre v. Pearl, 595 A.2d 1027 (Me. 1991).
Bahre v. Pearl, 595 A.2d 1027 (Me. 1991). · cites it 2× “8 Pearl next contends that shares in the Pearl Company 9 cannot be the subject of a court order entered pursuant to 11 M.R.S.A. § 8-317, requiring Pearl to deposit the shares with his attorney as an escrow agent as a means of effecting a valid attachment by possession.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 8-317(6) — 1 case
Bahre v. Pearl, 595 A.2d 1027 (Me. 1991). “8 Pearl next contends that shares in the Pearl Company 9 cannot be the subject of a court order entered pursuant to 11 M.R.S.A. § 8-317, requiring Pearl to deposit the shares with his attorney as an escrow agent as a means of effecting a valid attachment by possession.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.