Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-207 (2026)

Rights and duties when collateral is in secured party's possession

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1965, c. 306, §24 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 699, §A1 (RP). PL 1999, c. 699, §A4 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–1992 · leading case: FDIC v. Caliendo, 802 F. Supp. 575 (D.N.H. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
FDIC v. Caliendo, 802 F. Supp. 575 (D.N.H. 1992). · cites it 3× “One source of the pledgee’s duty of reasonable care is found in Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11 § 9-207(1) (West 1964 & Supp.”
Poultry Processing, Inc. v. Mendelson, 584 A.2d 659 (Me. 1991). · cites it 2× “Whether the standard of care contained in 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-207 is incorporated into the provisions of 11 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-207(1) — 2 cases
FDIC v. Caliendo, 802 F. Supp. 575 (D.N.H. 1992). “One source of the pledgee’s duty of reasonable care is found in Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11 § 9-207(1) (West 1964 & Supp.”
Poultry Processing, Inc. v. Mendelson, 584 A.2d 659 (Me. 1991). “Whether the standard of care contained in 11 M.R.S.A. § 9-207 is incorporated into the provisions of 11 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.