Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 11
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 11, § 9-315 (2026)

Priority when goods are commingled or processed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1999, c. 699, §A1 (RP). PL 1999, c. 699, §A4 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1993 · leading case: Casco N. Bank, N.A. v. Green Corp. (In Re Green Corp.), 154 B.R. 819 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Casco N. Bank, N.A. v. Green Corp. (In Re Green Corp.), 154 B.R. 819 (Bankr. D. Me. 1993). “11 M.R.S.A. § 9-315. 17 c. Wrapping Up. In view of § 552(b)’s injunction to give postpetition effect to a security interest only in the “proceeds, products, offspring, rents or profits” of prepetition collateral in accordance with applicable nonbankruptcy law and the content of…”
Argus Mgmt. Corp. v. Pillsbury Co. (In Re Hillcrest Foods, Inc.), 40 B.R. 360 (Bankr. D. Me. 1984). “at 67 , and the Court will leave for future determination issues such as tracing, the application (if any) of Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11, § 9-315, etc. 4 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.