Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 4451 (2026)

Lobsters; length, double gauge measure

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1965, c. 30, §1 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 408, §5 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 318, §1 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 661, §4 (RP).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1968–1978 · leading case: New Hampshire v. Maine, 426 U.S. 363 (1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

New Hampshire v. Maine, 426 U.S. 363 (1976). · cites it 2× “Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 4404 (Supp.”

State v. Dow, 392 A.2d 532 (Me. 1978). · cites it 5× “We have reviewed the presiding Justice’s other evidentiary rulings and find no merit in defendants’ complaints. III. Possession within the Meaning of the Statute The defendants assert that the evidence is insufficient to establish possession on the part of both defendants.”

Stavis Ipswich Clam Co. v. Green, 283 F. Supp. 586 (D. Me. 1968). · cites it 2× “However, he was unable to show that the introduction of foreign lobster meat into the state would substantially encourage Maine fishermen to engage in these illicit operations or that they could not be effectively dealt with by other licensing and enforcement provisions of the…”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 12, § 4451(1)(A) — 1 case

State v. Dow, 392 A.2d 532 (Me. 1978). “We have reviewed the presiding Justice’s other evidentiary rulings and find no merit in defendants’ complaints. III. Possession within the Meaning of the Statute The defendants assert that the evidence is insufficient to establish possession on the part of both defendants.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.