Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 1502-C (2026)

Discretionary costs

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
In addition to other costs allowed to the prevailing party, the court may include as costs, in such amounts as it considers just and reasonable, any of the following items:   [PL 1985, c. 384, §4 (NEW).]
1.  Reasonable expert witness fees and expenses.  Expert witness fees and expenses, as allowed by Title 16, section 251;  
[PL 1985, c. 384, §4 (NEW).]
2.  Cost of medical reports.  The cost of reasonable medical reports, not including costs of the examination or treatment of a patient, which are prepared for the purpose of litigation and which are exchanged by the parties;  
[PL 1985, c. 384, §4 (NEW).]
3.  Visual aids.  The reasonable costs of charts, diagrams, photographs and other visual aids necessary for clear understanding of the case by the court or jury not to exceed $500;  
[PL 1985, c. 384, §4 (NEW).]
4.  Costs of depositions.  Costs in the taking of depositions as allowed by rule of the Supreme Judicial Court or by other law; and  
[PL 1985, c. 384, §4 (NEW).]
5.  Other costs.  Such other costs as the Supreme Judicial Court may allow by rule.  
[PL 1985, c. 384, §4 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1985, c. 384, §4 (NEW).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1989–2019 · leading case: Mahar v. StoneWood Transp., 2003 ME 63 (Me. 2003).
Mahar v. StoneWood Transp., 2003 ME 63 (Me. 2003). “Title 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C (2003) also, under certain circumstances, provides for the allowance of other discretionary costs such as medical reports.”
McCarthy v. U.S.I. Corp., 678 A.2d 48 (Me. 1996). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C (Supp.1995) and 16 M.”
Barzellone v. Presley, 2005 OK 86 (Okla. 2005). “Title 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C(3) (1969). 35 . Higgins v.”
Trask v. Auto. Ins. Co., 1999 ME 94 (Me. 1999). · cites it 2× “In relevant part, 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C (Supp.1998) provides: In addition to other costs allowed to the prevailing party, the court may include as costs, in such amounts as it considers just and reasonable, any of the following items: 1.”
Arsenault v. Crossman, 1997 ME 92 (Me. 1997). · cites it 2× “"); 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C ("In addition to other costs allowed to the prevailing party.”
Poland v. Webb, 1998 ME 104 (Me. 1998). “Expert witness costs are addressed in 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C and 16 M.R.S.A. § 251.”
Boudreau v. Mfrs. & Merchants Mut. Ins., 588 A.2d 286 (Me. 1991). “An award of costs for the taking of depositions pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C (Supp. 1990) and M.R.”
Cole v. A.J. Cole & Sons, Inc., 567 A.2d 1342 (Me. 1989). “14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C (Supp.1988). Witnesses .”
Randy N. Oliver, II v. E. Maine Med. Ctr., 2018 ME 123 (Me. 2018). · cites it 2× “2d 1278 ("Those statutory provisions [ 14 M.R.S. § 1502-C and 16 M.R.S. § 251 ] authorize only fees that are directly related to attendance at trial.”
Warren-White v. Sullivan (Me. Super. Ct 2019). · cites it 4× “Pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C, Plaintiffs have requested recovery of the following costs, to which Defendant objects: 1 Defendant further argues that it should not have to bear the expense of Mr.”
Beal v. Ordway (Me. Super. Ct 2013). · cites it 5× “14 M.R.S. § 1502-C. The Court finds the following to be reasonable discretionary costs permitted by 14 M.”
Le v. Averill Constr. LLC (Me. Super. Ct 2018). · cites it 2× “With respect to plaintiffs' request for the fees and expenses incurred for their expert witness pursuant to 14 M.R.S. § 1502-C(l), the request is disallowed.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 1502-C(1) — 4 cases
McCarthy v. U.S.I. Corp., 678 A.2d 48 (Me. 1996). “Pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C (Supp.1995) and 16 M.”
Trask v. Auto. Ins. Co., 1999 ME 94 (Me. 1999). “In relevant part, 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C (Supp.1998) provides: In addition to other costs allowed to the prevailing party, the court may include as costs, in such amounts as it considers just and reasonable, any of the following items: 1.”
Randy N. Oliver, II v. E. Maine Med. Ctr., 2018 ME 123 (Me. 2018). “2d 1278 ("Those statutory provisions [ 14 M.R.S. § 1502-C and 16 M.R.S. § 251 ] authorize only fees that are directly related to attendance at trial.”
Roberts v. Bolduc (Me. Super. Ct 2001).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 1502-C(2) — 1 case
Roberts v. Bolduc (Me. Super. Ct 2001).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 1502-C(3) — 2 cases
Barzellone v. Presley, 2005 OK 86 (Okla. 2005). “Title 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502-C(3) (1969). 35 . Higgins v.”
Ryan v. Flanagan (Me. Super. Ct 2002).
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 1502-C(l) — 1 case
Le v. Averill Constr. LLC (Me. Super. Ct 2018). “With respect to plaintiffs' request for the fees and expenses incurred for their expert witness pursuant to 14 M.R.S. § 1502-C(l), the request is disallowed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.