Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 1502 (2026)

Parties and attorneys

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1985, c. 384, §2 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1979–2018 · leading case: Arsenault v. Crossman, 1997 ME 92 (Me. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Arsenault v. Crossman, 1997 ME 92 (Me. 1997). · cites it 2× “[5] The Bill was entitled "An Act to Clarify Recoverable Costs in Civil Actions;" and proposed that 14 M.R.S.A. § 1502 be enacted as follows: § 1502.”
Le v. Averill Constr. LLC (Me. Super. Ct 2018). · cites it 2× “14 M.R.S. § 1502­ B(4). With respect to plaintiffs' request for the fees and expenses incurred for their expert witness pursuant to 14 M.”
Chrysler Grp., LLC v. Dunlap (Me. Super. Ct 2016). “) In light of the fact that Darling's prevailed on three of the four issues raised in its motion for summary judgment and the close relation between the "exchange" and "core" claims, the Board found that Darling's was entitled to all of the $19,864.87 in fees that Chrysler…”
Beal v. Ordway (Me. Super. Ct 2013). “00 for deposition costs, and $100 for visual aids, as that term is defined in 14 M.R.S. §1502- C.. In its discretion, the Court considers $1,804.”
Powell v. James Newspaper, Inc., 400 A.2d 362 (Me. 1979). “The costs shall be taxed within 30 days from the rendition of judgment. 14 M.R. S.A. § 1519. It was the Clerk’s duty, and it remains the Clerk’s duty, to tax the costs to which the Defendants are entitled under the provisions of 14 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.