Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 1602-A (2026)

Interest after judgment

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1983, c. 427, §2 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 646, §4 (RPR). PL 1989, c. 502, §B15 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 489 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 471, §D14 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 460, §5 (RP).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 19 cases, 1984–2011 · leading case: Schindler v. Nilsen, 2001 ME 58 (Me. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Schindler v. Nilsen, 2001 ME 58 (Me. 2001). · cites it 4× “25% per month, see 14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A(1) (Supp. 2000), and it may go even higher depending on the price of 52-week treasury bills immediately prior to the time the interest rate is to be calculated.”

A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard Beach, 2001 ME 128 (Me. 2001). · cites it 6× “Pursuant to section 6332, the Town was relieved of its *836 obligation with respect to the surrendered money, and the court did not err in reducing the writ by the amount paid to the IRS.”

Austin v. Austin, 2000 ME 61 (Me. 2000). · cites it 3× “The controlling statute for post-judgment interest is 14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A (Supp.1999). 2 We re *1000 view the trial court’s construction of the post-judgment interest statute for errors of law.”

Tarbuck v. Jaeckel, 2000 ME 105 (Me. 2000). · cites it 3× “14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A (Supp.1999); see also Allen v.”

Jenkins, Inc. v. Walsh Bros., Inc., 2001 ME 98 (Me. 2001). “30 In addition, the court stated: "Jenkins shall be entitled’to additional post-judgment interest and penalties of 12 percent under 14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A and 10 M.R.S.A. § 1118(2) respectively after the entry of judgment.”

Raymond v. Raymond, 480 A.2d 718 (Me. 1984). · cites it 2× “14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A (Supp.1983-1984). If the present post-judgment interest statute had been applicable at the time Mr.”

Walsh v. Cusack, 2008 ME 74 (Me. 2008). · cites it 2× “See 14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A (2003), repealed and replaced by P.”

Carter v. Williams, 2002 ME 50 (Me. 2002). “” 14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A (Supp.2001). We review the construction of the post-judgment interest statute de novo for errors of law.”

In Re Valuation of Common Stock of McLoon Oil Co., 565 A.2d 997 (Me. 1989). “§ 1602-A (1989), provides that “the version of section 1602 repealed by this Act shall apply to all complaints filed which relate to actions for which the incident giving rise to the cause of action occurred before the effective date of this Act.” 14 M.”

Fitzgerald v. Gamester, 1999 ME 92 (Me. 1999). · cites it 5× “§ 1602(1) (prejudgment rates); 14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A (postjudgment rates).”

Allen v. Allen, 629 A.2d 1228 (Me. 1993). · cites it 3× “14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A. Accordingly, the trial court’s compounding of the interest awarded to Corinne was in error.”

Townsend v. Chute Chem. Co., 1997 ME 46 (Me. 1997). “Pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A (Supp.1996), post-judgment interest is available “[flrom and after the date of entry on an order of judgment, including the period of the pendency of an appeal_” We have concluded that post-judgment interest will not be allowed from the date of…”

Show all 19 citing cases →

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 1602-A(1) — 2 cases

Schindler v. Nilsen, 2001 ME 58 (Me. 2001). “25% per month, see 14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A(1) (Supp. 2000), and it may go even higher depending on the price of 52-week treasury bills immediately prior to the time the interest rate is to be calculated.”

Fitzgerald v. Gamester, 1999 ME 92 (Me. 1999). “§ 1602(1) (prejudgment rates); 14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A (postjudgment rates).”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 14, § 1602-A(2) — 2 cases

Fitzgerald v. Gamester, 1999 ME 92 (Me. 1999). “§ 1602(1) (prejudgment rates); 14 M.R.S.A. § 1602-A (postjudgment rates).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.