Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases, 1979–1985 · leading case:
State v. Gleason, 404 A.2d 573 (Me. 1979).
State v. Gleason, 404 A.2d 573 (Me. 1979).
· cites it 8× “He also challenged certain relevant portions of 15 M.R.S.A. § 3203 (Supp.1978) as unconstitutionally vague.”
State v. Ann Marie C., 407 A.2d 715 (Me. 1979).
· cites it 5× “If he is to be adjudicated a juvenile offender, it should be done quickly in order that the rehabilitative processes of the juvenile system will be promptly available to him.”
State v. Michael L., 441 A.2d 684 (Me. 1982).
· cites it 4× “Michael's counsel uses these facts to argue that the police failed to immediately notify an intake worker as required by 15 M.R.S.A. § 3203(1) and that he was, therefore, denied the benefits and protections of 15 M.”
Matter of Benoit, 487 A.2d 1158 (Me. 1985).
“The Juvenile Code in 15 M.R.S.A. § 3203(4)(A) (Supp. 1984-1985) provides: "An intake worker shall direct the release or detention of a juvenile pending his initial appearance before the court.”
Desrosiers v. Androscoggin Cnty., 611 F. Supp. 897 (D. Me. 1985).
“15 M.R.S.A. § 3203. Dispositions for adjudicated juvenile offenders include (1) allowing the juvenile to remain in the custody of the juvenile’s parents; (2) requiring the juvenile to participate in a supervised work program; (3) committing the juvenile to the Department of…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 3203(1) — 1 case
State v. Michael L., 441 A.2d 684 (Me. 1982).
“Michael's counsel uses these facts to argue that the police failed to immediately notify an intake worker as required by 15 M.R.S.A. § 3203(1) and that he was, therefore, denied the benefits and protections of 15 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 3203(2) — 1 case
State v. Ann Marie C., 407 A.2d 715 (Me. 1979).
“If he is to be adjudicated a juvenile offender, it should be done quickly in order that the rehabilitative processes of the juvenile system will be promptly available to him.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 3203(2)(A) — 1 case
State v. Ann Marie C., 407 A.2d 715 (Me. 1979).
“If he is to be adjudicated a juvenile offender, it should be done quickly in order that the rehabilitative processes of the juvenile system will be promptly available to him.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 3203(4) — 1 case
State v. Gleason, 404 A.2d 573 (Me. 1979).
“He also challenged certain relevant portions of 15 M.R.S.A. § 3203 (Supp.1978) as unconstitutionally vague.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 3203(4)(A) — 1 case
Matter of Benoit, 487 A.2d 1158 (Me. 1985).
“The Juvenile Code in 15 M.R.S.A. § 3203(4)(A) (Supp. 1984-1985) provides: "An intake worker shall direct the release or detention of a juvenile pending his initial appearance before the court.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 3203(4)(B)(4) — 1 case
State v. Gleason, 404 A.2d 573 (Me. 1979).
“He also challenged certain relevant portions of 15 M.R.S.A. § 3203 (Supp.1978) as unconstitutionally vague.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 3203(4)(C) — 1 case
State v. Gleason, 404 A.2d 573 (Me. 1979).
“He also challenged certain relevant portions of 15 M.R.S.A. § 3203 (Supp.1978) as unconstitutionally vague.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 3203(5) — 1 case
State v. Gleason, 404 A.2d 573 (Me. 1979).
“He also challenged certain relevant portions of 15 M.R.S.A. § 3203 (Supp.1978) as unconstitutionally vague.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 3203(7) — 1 case
State v. Gleason, 404 A.2d 573 (Me. 1979).
“He also challenged certain relevant portions of 15 M.R.S.A. § 3203 (Supp.1978) as unconstitutionally vague.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.