Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 17
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 1211 (2026)

Destruction of certain animals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 598, §13 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 317 (RPR). PL 1987, c. 383, §5 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1985 · leading case: State v. Hudson, 470 A.2d 786 (Me. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hudson, 470 A.2d 786 (Me. 1984). · cites it 2× “§ 1211 with possession of the horse given by the court to MSSPA, the defendant would have been responsible for the payment of “all expenses incurred in connection with taking and keeping of the animal and providing it with care and support”, 17 M.R.S.A. § 1211(4), even without a…”
Maine State Soc'y for the Prot. of Animals v. Warren, 492 A.2d 1259 (Me. 1985). · cites it 3× “’s claim of a statutory lien under 17 M.R.S.A. § 1211 (1983) (the cruelty-to-animals statute) on ten horses owned by defendants Earl and Joy Warren of Chester-ville.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 1211(1) — 1 case
Maine State Soc'y for the Prot. of Animals v. Warren, 492 A.2d 1259 (Me. 1985). “’s claim of a statutory lien under 17 M.R.S.A. § 1211 (1983) (the cruelty-to-animals statute) on ten horses owned by defendants Earl and Joy Warren of Chester-ville.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 1211(4) — 1 case
State v. Hudson, 470 A.2d 786 (Me. 1984). “§ 1211 with possession of the horse given by the court to MSSPA, the defendant would have been responsible for the payment of “all expenses incurred in connection with taking and keeping of the animal and providing it with care and support”, 17 M.R.S.A. § 1211(4), even without a…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 1211(5) — 2 cases
State v. Hudson, 470 A.2d 786 (Me. 1984). “§ 1211 with possession of the horse given by the court to MSSPA, the defendant would have been responsible for the payment of “all expenses incurred in connection with taking and keeping of the animal and providing it with care and support”, 17 M.R.S.A. § 1211(4), even without a…”
Maine State Soc'y for the Prot. of Animals v. Warren, 492 A.2d 1259 (Me. 1985). “’s claim of a statutory lien under 17 M.R.S.A. § 1211 (1983) (the cruelty-to-animals statute) on ten horses owned by defendants Earl and Joy Warren of Chester-ville.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.