Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 330 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 735, §3 (NEW). PL 1975, c. 410, §1 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 740, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 350, §1 (RPR). PL 1979, c. 271, §1 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 412, §1 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 225, §1 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 705, §§1-4 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 190, §1 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 314, §1 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 674, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 342, §3 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 672, §§1-4 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 563, §12 (AMD). PL 2009, c. 487, Pt. A, §1 (RP). IB 2009, c. 2, §50 (AMD). PL 2011, c. 420, Pt. A, §10 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1976–1997 · leading case: Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Jud. Court, 355 A.2d 341 (Me. 1976).
Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Jud. Court, 355 A.2d 341 (Me. 1976). · cites it 2× “17 MRSA § 330, sub-§ 1, as enacted by PL 1973, c.”
Chenard v. Marcel Motors, 387 A.2d 596 (Me. 1978). “§§ 330-346 which exception permits various nonprofit organizations to raise funds through the use of “games of chance” defined as a game, contest, scheme or device in which a person stakes or risks something of value for an opportunity to win something of value and in which the…”
Infinity Grp., Inc. v. Manzagol, 884 P.2d 523 (N.M. Ct. App. 1994). “Pocket Part 1994) (addressing electronic and computerized bingo); Me.Rev. Stat.Ann. tit. 17, § 330(1-A) (West Cum.”
Classic Oldsmobile-Cadillac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. State, 1997 ME 214 (Me. 1997). · cites it 3× “17 M.R.S.A. § 330(2) (Supp.1996). [¶ 5] Statutory interpretation is a matter of law, Cook v.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 330(2) — 2 cases
Chenard v. Marcel Motors, 387 A.2d 596 (Me. 1978). “§§ 330-346 which exception permits various nonprofit organizations to raise funds through the use of “games of chance” defined as a game, contest, scheme or device in which a person stakes or risks something of value for an opportunity to win something of value and in which the…”
Classic Oldsmobile-Cadillac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. State, 1997 ME 214 (Me. 1997). “17 M.R.S.A. § 330(2) (Supp.1996). [¶ 5] Statutory interpretation is a matter of law, Cook v.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 330(8) — 1 case
Classic Oldsmobile-Cadillac-GMC Truck, Inc. v. State, 1997 ME 214 (Me. 1997). “17 M.R.S.A. § 330(2) (Supp.1996). [¶ 5] Statutory interpretation is a matter of law, Cook v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.