Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 17
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17, § 3401-A (2026)

-firearm

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1971, c. 539, §19 (NEW). PL 1975, c. 499, §19 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1974–1978 · leading case: State v. Lewis, 373 A.2d 603 (Me. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Lewis, 373 A.2d 603 (Me. 1977). · cites it 2× “Lewis, for the armed robbery of Gott and Durgin in violation of 17 M.R.S.A. § 3401-A. 1 At trial, the three accomplices in the robbery, Sirois, Edwards and St.”
State v. Gordon, 321 A.2d 352 (Me. 1974). · cites it 2× “An indictment returned (on June 27, 1972) by a Cumberland County Grand Jury to the Superior Court charged defendant, Richard John Gordon, with having committed the crime of “armed robbery” in violation of 17 M.R.S.A. § 3401-A. 1 A separate indictment accused defendant of having,…”
State v. Babcock, 361 A.2d 911 (Me. 1976). “17 M.R.S.A. § 3401-A. The specific claim of error results from the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from the automobile he was driving when he was stopped by a police officer.”
State v. Rice, 379 A.2d 140 (Me. 1977). “§ 201-A) and Armed Robbery (17 M.R.S.A. § 3401-A). Defendant has appealed from the judgments of conviction entered on the verdicts.”
State v. Bellanceau, 367 A.2d 1034 (Me. 1977). “17 M.R.S.A. § 3401-A. By appropriate motions seasonably filed the defendant has preserved for appellate review his contention that the evidence was insufficient to support the guilty verdict.”
State v. Rogers, 389 A.2d 36 (Me. 1978). “17 M.R.S.A. § 3401-A, repealed by P.L.1975, c.”
State v. Gagne, 343 A.2d 186 (Me. 1975). “17 M.R.S.A. § 3401-A. 2 . 17 M.R.S.A. § 201-A.”
State v. Constantine, 342 A.2d 735 (Me. 1975). “Appellant was convicted of a violation of 17 M.R.S.A. § 3401-A (armed robbery). By this appeal he challenges the correctness of the conviction because, as he says, (1) by their own testimony the victims established that they were not placed in fear, and (2) there was no evidence…”
State v. Corliss, 379 A.2d 998 (Me. 1977). · cites it 2× “Corliss, then 16 years of age, 1 guilty of committing robbery with a firearm in violation of 17 M.R.S.A. § 3401-A (P.L. 1971, ch. 539, § 19).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.