Notes of Decisions
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 925 N.E.2d 533 (Mass. 2010).
· cites it 5× “Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 255(1). The elements of the Maine offense of unlawful sexual contact and the Massachusetts offense of indecent assault and battery on a child under fourteen are essentially the same.”
State v. Haskell, 2001 ME 154 (Me. 2001).
· cites it 5× “) on a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawful sexual contact in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.2000) (Class C).”
State v. Bailey, 2012 ME 55 (Me. 2012).
· cites it 4× “§ 255-A(1)(E) (2011); 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.2002), [2] entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Anderson, J.”
State v. Moores, 910 A.2d 373 (Me. 2006).
· cites it 5× “Title 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255 was repealed and replaced by P.”
State of Maine v. Benjamin H. Hodgdon II, 2017 ME 122 (Me. 2017).
· cites it 4× “2000); 1 unlawful sexual contact (Class C), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C), (2) (Supp. 2000); 2 and sexual abuse of a minor (Class C), 17-A M.”
State of Maine v. James A. Reynolds, 2018 ME 124 (Me. 2018).
· cites it 4× “1997); 1 five counts of unlawful sexual contact (Class C), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp. 1997); 2 and two counts of sexual abuse of a minor (Class C), 17-A M.”
State v. Dumont, 507 A.2d 164 (Me. 1986).
· cites it 4× “After a jury trial in Superior Court (York County) Robert Dumont was convicted of unlawful sexual contact, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (1983), and sentenced to three years in the Maine State Prison, with one and one-half years suspended.”
State of Maine v. Gregory S. Olah, 2018 ME 56 (Me. 2018).
· cites it 3× “A new statute was enacted to replace former 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255 (Supp. 2002), effective January 31, 2003.”
State v. Almurshidy, 1999 ME 97 (Me. 1999).
· cites it 4× “See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(H) (Supp.1998). He was further charged with knowingly furnishing liquor to the victim, who was a minor.”
State v. Smith, 394 A.2d 259 (Me. 1978).
· cites it 5× “It is clear, a violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (unlawful sexual contact) has been established only when it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the sexual contact was "for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire" 17-A M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 255(1) — 7 cases
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 925 N.E.2d 533 (Mass. 2010).
“Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 255(1). The elements of the Maine offense of unlawful sexual contact and the Massachusetts offense of indecent assault and battery on a child under fourteen are essentially the same.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 255(1)(A) — 10 cases
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 255(1)(B) — 4 cases
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 255(1)(C) — 92 cases
State v. Haskell, 2001 ME 154 (Me. 2001).
“) on a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawful sexual contact in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.2000) (Class C).”
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 925 N.E.2d 533 (Mass. 2010).
“Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 17-A, § 255(1). The elements of the Maine offense of unlawful sexual contact and the Massachusetts offense of indecent assault and battery on a child under fourteen are essentially the same.”
State v. Bailey, 2012 ME 55 (Me. 2012).
“§ 255-A(1)(E) (2011); 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.2002), [2] entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Anderson, J.”
State of Maine v. Benjamin H. Hodgdon II, 2017 ME 122 (Me. 2017).
“2000); 1 unlawful sexual contact (Class C), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C), (2) (Supp. 2000); 2 and sexual abuse of a minor (Class C), 17-A M.”
State of Maine v. James A. Reynolds, 2018 ME 124 (Me. 2018).
“1997); 1 five counts of unlawful sexual contact (Class C), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp. 1997); 2 and two counts of sexual abuse of a minor (Class C), 17-A M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 255(1)(F) — 1 case
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 255(1)(G) — 1 case
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 255(1)(H) — 4 cases
State v. Almurshidy, 1999 ME 97 (Me. 1999).
“See 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(H) (Supp.1998). He was further charged with knowingly furnishing liquor to the victim, who was a minor.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 255(2) — 3 cases
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 255(l) — 1 case
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 255(l)(c) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.