Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 19
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 762 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 578, §§5,7 (NEW). PL 1979, c. 677, §§4,5,18 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 420, §3 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 583, §26 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 557 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 862, §§5-9 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 760, §4 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 469, §3 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 475, §§7,8 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 469, §3 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 650, §10 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 694, §B1 (RP). PL 1995, c. 694, §E2 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1993–1997 · leading case: Sordyl v. Sordyl, 1997 ME 87 (Me. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sordyl v. Sordyl, 1997 ME 87 (Me. 1997). · cites it 2× “Defendant seeks to challenge an evidentiary ruling made by the District Court in finding “abuse” within the meaning of 19 M.R.S.A. § 762(1)(B) (1981 & Supp.1996).”
State v. Haley, 629 A.2d 605 (Me. 1993). “The State argues that a portion of the definition of abuse given in 19 M.R.S.A. § 762(1) fits Haley’s conduct.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 762(1) — 1 case
State v. Haley, 629 A.2d 605 (Me. 1993). “The State argues that a portion of the definition of abuse given in 19 M.R.S.A. § 762(1) fits Haley’s conduct.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 762(1)(B) — 1 case
Sordyl v. Sordyl, 1997 ME 87 (Me. 1997). “Defendant seeks to challenge an evidentiary ruling made by the District Court in finding “abuse” within the meaning of 19 M.R.S.A. § 762(1)(B) (1981 & Supp.1996).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.