Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 19
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 810 (2026)

Information under oath to be submitted to the court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 481, §4 (NEW). PL 1995, c. 694, §B1 (RP). PL 1995, c. 694, §E2 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1994 · leading case: Wambold v. Wambold, 651 A.2d 330 (Me. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wambold v. Wambold, 651 A.2d 330 (Me. 1994). “§ 810(3) (“Each party has a continuing duty to inform the court of any custody proceeding concerning the child in this or any other state of which he obtained information during this proceeding.”). Darla may be correct that, technically, she was not required to list the dates…”
Gluse v. Dennison, 462 A.2d 32 (Me. 1983). “*33 The Defendants first contend that the Probate Court was without jurisdiction to terminate their parental rights because the Plaintiffs did not with their first pleading file a Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) affidavit in conformity with 19 M.R.S.A. § 810…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 19, § 810(3) — 1 case
Wambold v. Wambold, 651 A.2d 330 (Me. 1994). “§ 810(3) (“Each party has a continuing duty to inform the court of any custody proceeding concerning the child in this or any other state of which he obtained information during this proceeding.”). Darla may be correct that, technically, she was not required to list the dates…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.