Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 21-A, § 115 (2026)

Restrictions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. Certain persons may not register or vote.

[PL 2001, c. 516, §1 (RP).]

2. Voting restricted to district. In a municipality that has voting districts, a voter may vote using only the ballot or ballots for the district in which the voter resides on election day.

[PL 2003, c. 447, §5 (AMD).]

3. Correct name and address on incoming voting list. A person whose name, or residence address in a municipality that has voting districts, does not appear correctly on the incoming voting list on election day may not vote at any election until it is corrected as provided in section 661.

[PL 2005, c. 453, §11 (AMD).]

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1985, c. 161, §6 (NEW). PL 1987, c. 188, §2 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 459, §13 (AMD). PL 2001, c. 516, §1 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 447, §5 (AMD). PL 2005, c. 453, §11 (AMD).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2004 · leading case: Doe Ex Rel. Maine Dep't of Human Servs. v. Rowe, 156 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D. Me. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Doe Ex Rel. Maine Dep't of Human Servs. v. Rowe, 156 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D. Me. 2001). · cites it 3× “2 § 1; see also 21-A M.R.S.A. § 115(1). A mentally ill person under guardianship, who votes knowing that he or she is subject to the prohibition, can be subject to criminal prosecution.”

Finn v. Toothaker (Me. Super. Ct 2004). · cites it 2× “See 21-A M.R.S.A. § 115(2) (1992) (prior to amendment).”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 21-A, § 115(1) — 1 case

Doe Ex Rel. Maine Dep't of Human Servs. v. Rowe, 156 F. Supp. 2d 35 (D. Me. 2001). “2 § 1; see also 21-A M.R.S.A. § 115(1). A mentally ill person under guardianship, who votes knowing that he or she is subject to the prohibition, can be subject to criminal prosecution.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 21-A, § 115(2) — 1 case

Finn v. Toothaker (Me. Super. Ct 2004). “See 21-A M.R.S.A. § 115(2) (1992) (prior to amendment).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.