Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 22
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 1 (2026)

Department; commissioner; bureaus; compensation; employees; definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 261, §§1-3 (AMD). PL 1967, c. 490, §7 (AMD). PL 1969, c. 504, §35 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 553, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1973, c. 793, §1 (RPR). P&SL 1975, c. 147, §G2 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 293, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 755, §4 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 771, §§207-209 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 78, §145 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 674, §§18,19 (AMD). PL 1979, c. 333 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 10, §1 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 703, §A4 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 409, §1 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 729, §5 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 785, §B82 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 329, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 400, §§3,14 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 507 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 576, §§3,5 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 878, §§A51,52 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 349, §50 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 685, §B2 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 418, §A1 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 560, §J2 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 689, §§B6,7 (REV). PL 2007, c. 539, Pt. N, §8 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1977–2002 · leading case: Baffer v. Dep't of Human Servs., 553 A.2d 659 (Me. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Baffer v. Dep't of Human Servs., 553 A.2d 659 (Me. 1989). “22 M.R.S.A. § 1 (Supp.1988). The term explicitly does not include “agency staff.”
City of Augusta v. Inhabitants of Alna, 370 A.2d 1381 (Me. 1977). “” See: 22 M.R.S.A. § 1. .There was evidence from which the presiding Justice could rationally have concluded that Augusta had furnished relief “in excess of .”
Roche v. Maine Bd. of Licensure in Med. (Me. Super. Ct 2002). “22 M.R.S.A §1 (2002). Nonetheless, this court must look to the Legislature’s definition of the practice of medicine: Unless licensed by the [Respondent], an individual may not practice medicine or surgery or a branch of medicine or surgery or claim to be legally licensed to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.