Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 22
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 2660 (2026)

Legislative findings

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 531, §1 (NEW). PL 2007, c. 399, §3 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–2007 · leading case: Centamore v. Dep't of Human Servs., 664 A.2d 369 (Me. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Centamore v. Dep't of Human Servs., 664 A.2d 369 (Me. 1995). · cites it 2× “22 M.R.S.A. § 2660 (emphasis added). 4 The legislative findings further reflect an intent to prevent depletion of such water resources by preventing wholesale transport of water from its natural location.”
Griswold v. Town of Denmark, 2007 ME 93 (Me. 2007). · cites it 2× “2 See 22 M.R.S. §§ 2660 to 2660-A (2006). [¶ 9] The Board of Selectmen concluded that Nestlé, which had the burden before the Board to establish each of the criteria necessary for the grant of its requested permit, see Gensheimer v.”
Griswold v. State of Maine (Me. Super. Ct 2007). “As part of its planned water extraction in the town of Denmark, Nestle had to receive approval from the town under the town ordinance and authorization from the Commissioner of DHHS under 22 M.R.S. § 2660­ A (subsequently amended) to transport the water.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.