Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 311 (2026)

Remedy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1977, c. 687, §1 (NEW). PL 1985, c. 443, §3 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 701 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 689, §B31 (AMD). PL 1997, c. 689, §C2 (AFF). PL 2001, c. 664, §1 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1981–2014 · leading case: Bradbury Mem'l Nursing Home v. Tall Pines Manor Assocs., 485 A.2d 634 (Me. 1984).
Bradbury Mem'l Nursing Home v. Tall Pines Manor Assocs., 485 A.2d 634 (Me. 1984). · cites it 6× “The Certificate of Need Act, 22 M.R.S.A. § 311, gives "any person aggrieved by a final decision of the department" the right to review in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 M.”
York Hosp. v. Dep't of Human Servs., 2005 ME 41 (Me. 2005). “[¶ 9] On May 5, 2003, the Collaborative filed a petition with the Superior Court seeking review of final agency action pursuant to the CON Act, 22 M.R.S.A. § 311 (1992 & Supp.2001), and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), 5 M.”
Hale v. Petit, 438 A.2d 226 (Me. 1981). “The Scope of Appellate Review Title 22 M.R.S.A. § 311 provides: Any person aggrieved by a final decision of the department made under the provisions of this Act shall be entitled to review in accordance with Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter VII, of the Administrative Procedure…”
Daniel Senior Living of Inverness I, LLC v. STV One Nineteen Senior Living, LLC, 161 So. 3d 196 (Ala. 2014). “1984) (“The Certificate of Need Act, 22 M.R.S.A. § 311, gives ‘any person aggrieved by a final decision of the department’ the right to review in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 M.”
Ex parte STV One Nineteen Senior Living, LLC, d/b/a Somerby at St. Vincent's One Nineteen. (Ala. 2014). “1984) ("The Certificate of Need Act, 22 M.R.S.A. § 311, gives 'any person aggrieved by a final decision of the department' the right to review in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 M.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.