Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 396-D (2026)

Adjustments to financial requirements

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1983, c. 579, §10 (NEW). PL 1985, c. 339, §§1,2 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 661, §§7-9 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 778, §§3,4 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 51, §1 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 402, §§A136,A137 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 440, §§2,3 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 542, §§H2,H8 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 769, §§A64-A66 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 777, §§1,6 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 811, §12 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 847, §1 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 386, §1 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 494 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 588, §§A10-29 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 878, §§A56,57 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 84, §2 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 485, §§6,7 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 528, §§Q1,2 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 528, §RRR (AFF). PL 1991, c. 591, §§Q1,2 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 587, §1 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 497, §4 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 653, §B4 (RP). PL 1995, c. 653, §B8 (AFF).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1987–1994 · leading case: Cent. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 644 A.2d 1383 (Me. 1994).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cent. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 644 A.2d 1383 (Me. 1994). · cites it 2× “See 22 M.R.S.A. § 396-D(7) (1992). [6] Pursuant to this provision, the Commission promulgated a regulation providing for a 10 percent increase in hospitals' working capital requirement to reflect the cost to hospitals of waiting for payment of hospital charges.”

Bath Mem'l Hosp. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 673 F. Supp. 628 (D. Me. 1987). “22 M.R.S.A. § 396-D(9)(D) and P.L. 1987, Ch.”

Mercy Hosp. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 559 A.2d 352 (Me. 1989). · cites it 2× “22 M.R.S.A. § 396-D(9)(B). The Commission has interpreted this statutory scheme to mean that if a cost increase is the sort that falls under the economic trend factor, the Commission need not also consider it under the unforeseen events category even though it would otherwise…”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 396-D(7) — 1 case

Cent. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 644 A.2d 1383 (Me. 1994). “See 22 M.R.S.A. § 396-D(7) (1992). [6] Pursuant to this provision, the Commission promulgated a regulation providing for a 10 percent increase in hospitals' working capital requirement to reflect the cost to hospitals of waiting for payment of hospital charges.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 396-D(9)(B) — 1 case

Mercy Hosp. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 559 A.2d 352 (Me. 1989). “22 M.R.S.A. § 396-D(9)(B). The Commission has interpreted this statutory scheme to mean that if a cost increase is the sort that falls under the economic trend factor, the Commission need not also consider it under the unforeseen events category even though it would otherwise…”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 396-D(9)(D) — 1 case

Bath Mem'l Hosp. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 673 F. Supp. 628 (D. Me. 1987). “22 M.R.S.A. § 396-D(9)(D) and P.L. 1987, Ch.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 396-D(l) — 1 case

Mercy Hosp. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 559 A.2d 352 (Me. 1989). “22 M.R.S.A. § 396-D(9)(B). The Commission has interpreted this statutory scheme to mean that if a cost increase is the sort that falls under the economic trend factor, the Commission need not also consider it under the unforeseen events category even though it would otherwise…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.