Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 22
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 398 (2026)

Procedures for establishment of revenue limits and interim adjustments

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1983, c. 579, §10 (NEW). PL 1985, c. 109, §2 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 778, §7 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 51, §2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 386, §2 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 771, §3 (AMD). PL 1995, c. 653, §B4 (RP). PL 1995, c. 653, §B8 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1992–1994 · leading case: E. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 601 A.2d 99 (Me. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
E. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 601 A.2d 99 (Me. 1992). · cites it 4× “On September 28,1990, the Hospital filed an application for an interim adjustment to financial requirements pursuant to 22 M.R.S.A. § 398(2) (Pamph.1990). The Commission did not render a final order within 120 days as mandated by the statute.”
Cent. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 644 A.2d 1383 (Me. 1994). · cites it 2× “See 22 M.R.S.A. § 398 (1992 & Supp.1993) (authorizing adjudicative proceedings before the Commission for setting of revenue limits where a hospital contests the Commission's proposed limits, and for interim adjustment to already-established revenue limits).”
E. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 632 A.2d 749 (Me. 1993). “22 M.R.S.A. § 398(2). The Commission failed to meet this deadline.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 398(2) — 2 cases
E. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 601 A.2d 99 (Me. 1992). “On September 28,1990, the Hospital filed an application for an interim adjustment to financial requirements pursuant to 22 M.R.S.A. § 398(2) (Pamph.1990). The Commission did not render a final order within 120 days as mandated by the statute.”
E. Maine Med. Ctr. v. Maine Health Care Fin. Comm'n, 632 A.2d 749 (Me. 1993). “22 M.R.S.A. § 398(2). The Commission failed to meet this deadline.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.