Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 22
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 4064 (2026)

Long-term foster care

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1979, c. 733, §18 (NEW). PL 1997, c. 39, §1 (AMD). PL 2007, c. 46, §1 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2005 · leading case: In re Thomas H., 889 A.2d 297 (Me. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Thomas H., 889 A.2d 297 (Me. 2005). · cites it 2× “Requiring the trial court to consider permanency and whether a compelling reason exists as to support long-term foster care is further supported by 22 M.R.S.A. § 4064 (2004). Section 4064 provides in pertinent part: 1.”
In Re Justin S., 595 A.2d 1058 (Me. 1991). “22 M.R.S.A. § 4064(2)(C) (Pamph.1990). Justin’s guardian ad litem strove to put together an open adoption contract that would provide him with the security of a permanent family while preserving his limited visits with Vanessa.”
Cote v. State of Maine, Dep't of Human Servs. (Me. Super. Ct 2002). “See 22 M.R.S.A. § 4064(2) (2001). In other words, the State’s sovereign immunity may have precluded the Plaintiff from recovering on its unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and quasi-contract claims.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 4064(2) — 1 case
Cote v. State of Maine, Dep't of Human Servs. (Me. Super. Ct 2002). “See 22 M.R.S.A. § 4064(2) (2001). In other words, the State’s sovereign immunity may have precluded the Plaintiff from recovering on its unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and quasi-contract claims.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 22, § 4064(2)(C) — 1 case
In Re Justin S., 595 A.2d 1058 (Me. 1991). “22 M.R.S.A. § 4064(2)(C) (Pamph.1990). Justin’s guardian ad litem strove to put together an open adoption contract that would provide him with the security of a permanent family while preserving his limited visits with Vanessa.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.