Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 23, § 154-B (2026)

Coercive action

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In no event shall the department either advance the time of condemnation, or defer negotiations or condemnation or take any other action coercive in nature, in order to compel an agreement on the price to be paid for property or property rights. [PL 1971, c. 593, §22 (AMD).]

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1971, c. 333, §4 (NEW). PL 1971, c. 593, §22 (AMD).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2009 · leading case: Portland Co. v. City of Portland, 2009 ME 98 (Me. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Portland Co. v. City of Portland, 2009 ME 98 (Me. 2009). · cites it 4× “The Portland Company also asserted several other claims, including a claim that the City violated 23 M.R.S. § 154-B (2008) 1 by coercing the Portland Company to accept a less advantageous agreement with Riverwalk than the Portland Company otherwise could have obtained.”

The Portland Co. v. City of Portland (Me. Super. Ct 2007). · cites it 3× “1 The Oty's motion is based on a Stipulation and Agreement between the parties that was executed shortly after this action was commenced.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.