Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 599 (2026)

Broadcasting industry contract

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Definition.  As used in this section, unless the context otherwise indicates, "broadcasting industry contract" means an employment contract between a person and a legal entity that owns one or more television stations or networks or one or more radio stations or networks.  
[PL 2003, c. 225, §1 (AMD).]
2.  Presumed unreasonable.  A broadcasting industry contract provision that requires an employee or prospective employee to refrain from obtaining employment in a specified geographic area for a specified period of time following expiration of the contract or upon termination of employment without fault of the employee is presumed to be unreasonable.  
[PL 1999, c. 406, §1 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1999, c. 406, §1 (NEW). PL 2003, c. 225, §1 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2013–2024 · leading case: Outside Television, Inc. v. Murin, 977 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D. Me. 2013).
Outside Television, Inc. v. Murin, 977 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D. Me. 2013). · cites it 5× “See 26 M.R.S.A. § 599. Murin’s contract with OTV falls within the statutory definition of a broadcasting industry contract.”
Cps Solutions LLC v. Sarle (D. Me. 2024). · cites it 2× “” 26 M.R.S. § 599- A(2).5 They are enforceable only if “they are reasonable and are no broader than necessary to protect one or more .”
Oshman Page, LLC v. Boothbay Region Water Dist. (Me. Super. Ct 2021). “" 26 M.R.S. § 599­ B(l)(A). There is no limiting language here that would indicate that the legislature intended to exclude relationships like the one between AMS and BRWD.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 599(2) — 1 case
Outside Television, Inc. v. Murin, 977 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D. Me. 2013). “See 26 M.R.S.A. § 599. Murin’s contract with OTV falls within the statutory definition of a broadcasting industry contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.