Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 29
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 1312-D (2026)

Provisions regarding suspensions imposed pursuant to conviction under sections 1312-B

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 468, §12 (NEW). PL 1981, c. 679, §§36-40 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 501, §§4,5 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 505, §2 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 718 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 809, §2 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 850, §3 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 412, §6 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 536, §§5-7 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 773, §§10,11 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 791, §22 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 861, §§24,25 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 514, §§17,25 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 784, §§9-11,18 (AMD). RR 1991, c. 2, §§110,111 (COR). PL 1991, c. 516, §2 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 597, §23 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 622, §Y12 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 751, §1 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 850, §16 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 631, §8 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 658, §§18-20 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 683, §A1 (RP). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1992–2002 · leading case: DiPietro v. Sec'y of State, 802 A.2d 399 (Me. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
DiPietro v. Sec'y of State, 802 A.2d 399 (Me. 2002). · cites it 2× “The Secretary of State relied on 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-D(1) (Pamph.1991), repealed and replaced by P.”
Benedix v. Sec'y of State, 603 A.2d 473 (Me. 1992). “On receipt of an attested copy of the court record of the 90-day suspension of Bene-dix’s license, the Secretary of State, acting pursuant to 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-D(1) (Pamph.1991), 1 increased the suspension pe *474 riod to the one year that is mandated for second-time OUI…”
Dana v. Sec'y of State, 629 A.2d 48 (Me. 1993). “29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-D(1) (Pamph. 1992), authorizing the Secretary to suspend the license of a person convicted of OUI, provides that “if the court fails to suspend the license .”
State v. Jamieson, 643 A.2d 380 (Me. 1994). “The notice stated: “You are notified that your operating privileges are restored with the condition that you do not operate a motor vehicle after having consumed intoxicating liquor in accordance with the provisions of 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-D subsection 11.” Although section…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 1312-D(1) — 3 cases
DiPietro v. Sec'y of State, 802 A.2d 399 (Me. 2002). “The Secretary of State relied on 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-D(1) (Pamph.1991), repealed and replaced by P.”
Benedix v. Sec'y of State, 603 A.2d 473 (Me. 1992). “On receipt of an attested copy of the court record of the 90-day suspension of Bene-dix’s license, the Secretary of State, acting pursuant to 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-D(1) (Pamph.1991), 1 increased the suspension pe *474 riod to the one year that is mandated for second-time OUI…”
Dana v. Sec'y of State, 629 A.2d 48 (Me. 1993). “29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-D(1) (Pamph. 1992), authorizing the Secretary to suspend the license of a person convicted of OUI, provides that “if the court fails to suspend the license .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.