Notes of Decisions
Connolly v. Royal Globe Ins., 455 A.2d 932 (Me. 1983).
“§ 2902(1); see 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(1) (1978) (financial responsibility law requires motorist to carry $20,000 of liability insurance for bodily injury).”
Gov't Employees Ins. Co. v. Concord Gen. Mut. Ins., 458 A.2d 1205 (Me. 1983).
· cites it 5× “This case turns on the question of whether an insurer can cancel a policy of automobile liability insurance that has been certified to the Secretary of State as proof of financial responsibility under 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(2) 1 without complying with any of the methods of…”
Dufour v. Metro. Prop. & Liab. Ins., 438 A.2d 1290 (Me. 1982).
“See also 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(1) (1978). Any automobile liability insurance policy provision that conflicts with that statute is void and unenforceable.”
Langer v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 552 A.2d 20 (Me. 1988).
“The two operators were jointly at fault in the accident, but their available insurance did not fully compensate Langer for her injuries: the motorcycle was uninsured and the *21 Volkswagen was insured only for the statutory minimum of $20,000 per person, 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(1)…”
McAllaster v. Bruton, 655 F. Supp. 1371 (D. Me. 1987).
“1986) and the Maine Financial Responsibility Act, Me.Rev.Stat.Ann.tit. 29, § 787(2) (1978).”
Govern. Emp. Ins. v. Concord Gen. Mut. Ins., 458 A.2d 1205 (Me. 1983).
· cites it 5× “This case turns on the question of whether an insurer can cancel a policy of automobile liability insurance that has been certified to the Secretary of State as proof of financial responsibility under 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(2) [1] without complying with any of the methods of…”
Allstate Ins. v. O'Shaughnessy, 384 A.2d 486 (N.H. 1978).
“The amounts of liability coverage required *72 by Maine’s financial responsibility law are the same as those required in New Hampshire, Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 787(1) (Supp. 1976); RSA 268:1 VII (Supp.”
Moody v. Horace Mann Ins., 634 A.2d 1309 (Me. 1993).
“A § 2902 (1990); 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(1) (1978). The question before us requires that we determine the relationship between the language of the underinsured motorist statute and Horace Mann’s insurance policy provisions.”
State v. Brochu, 402 A.2d 1300 (Me. 1979).
“29 M.R.S.A. § 787(7); operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 787(1) — 5 cases
Connolly v. Royal Globe Ins., 455 A.2d 932 (Me. 1983).
“§ 2902(1); see 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(1) (1978) (financial responsibility law requires motorist to carry $20,000 of liability insurance for bodily injury).”
Dufour v. Metro. Prop. & Liab. Ins., 438 A.2d 1290 (Me. 1982).
“See also 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(1) (1978). Any automobile liability insurance policy provision that conflicts with that statute is void and unenforceable.”
Langer v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 552 A.2d 20 (Me. 1988).
“The two operators were jointly at fault in the accident, but their available insurance did not fully compensate Langer for her injuries: the motorcycle was uninsured and the *21 Volkswagen was insured only for the statutory minimum of $20,000 per person, 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(1)…”
Allstate Ins. v. O'Shaughnessy, 384 A.2d 486 (N.H. 1978).
“The amounts of liability coverage required *72 by Maine’s financial responsibility law are the same as those required in New Hampshire, Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 787(1) (Supp. 1976); RSA 268:1 VII (Supp.”
Moody v. Horace Mann Ins., 634 A.2d 1309 (Me. 1993).
“A § 2902 (1990); 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(1) (1978). The question before us requires that we determine the relationship between the language of the underinsured motorist statute and Horace Mann’s insurance policy provisions.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 787(2) — 3 cases
McAllaster v. Bruton, 655 F. Supp. 1371 (D. Me. 1987).
“1986) and the Maine Financial Responsibility Act, Me.Rev.Stat.Ann.tit. 29, § 787(2) (1978).”
Gov't Employees Ins. Co. v. Concord Gen. Mut. Ins., 458 A.2d 1205 (Me. 1983).
“This case turns on the question of whether an insurer can cancel a policy of automobile liability insurance that has been certified to the Secretary of State as proof of financial responsibility under 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(2) 1 without complying with any of the methods of…”
Govern. Emp. Ins. v. Concord Gen. Mut. Ins., 458 A.2d 1205 (Me. 1983).
“This case turns on the question of whether an insurer can cancel a policy of automobile liability insurance that has been certified to the Secretary of State as proof of financial responsibility under 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(2) [1] without complying with any of the methods of…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 787(6) — 2 cases
Gov't Employees Ins. Co. v. Concord Gen. Mut. Ins., 458 A.2d 1205 (Me. 1983).
“This case turns on the question of whether an insurer can cancel a policy of automobile liability insurance that has been certified to the Secretary of State as proof of financial responsibility under 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(2) 1 without complying with any of the methods of…”
Govern. Emp. Ins. v. Concord Gen. Mut. Ins., 458 A.2d 1205 (Me. 1983).
“This case turns on the question of whether an insurer can cancel a policy of automobile liability insurance that has been certified to the Secretary of State as proof of financial responsibility under 29 M.R.S.A. § 787(2) [1] without complying with any of the methods of…”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 787(7) — 1 case
State v. Brochu, 402 A.2d 1300 (Me. 1979).
“29 M.R.S.A. § 787(7); operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.