Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 29
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 29, § 991 (2026)

Driving on roadways laned for traffic

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1967, c. 245, §§17,18 (AMD). PL 1993, c. 683, §A1 (RP). PL 1993, c. 683, §B5 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1966–1968 · leading case: Williams v. Kinney, 220 A.2d 234 (Me. 1966).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Williams v. Kinney, 220 A.2d 234 (Me. 1966). · cites it 6× “1947, and is now 29 M.R.S.A. § 991. This rule was super-imposed upon the Class A cases by McCarthy, supra.”
Moses v. Scott Paper Co., 280 F. Supp. 37 (D. Me. 1968). “Plaintiff has asserted that in addition to his speed, Bacon was also negligent because he was straddling the dividing line between the eastbound curb and passing lanes in violation of the provisions of 29 M.R.S.A. § 991 (1964), which requires that on a highway laned for traffic,…”
Ricker v. Morin Brick Co., 223 A.2d 536 (Me. 1966). · cites it 4× “” 4 In Verrill (1932) the defendant’s overtaking vehicle was proceeding in a lane designated for passing, later affirmed by statute of 1947, now 29 M.R.S.A. § 991. Here defendant’s overtaking vehicle was proceeding in lanes three, two and one or two and one successively to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.