Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 2051 (2026)

Call of town meeting

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 456, §A102 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 736, §45 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 737, §§A1,C106 (RP). PL 1989, c. 6 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 104, §§C8,C10 (AMD).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1980 · leading case: Buck v. Town of Yarmouth, 402 A.2d 860 (Me. 1979).
Buck v. Town of Yarmouth, 402 A.2d 860 (Me. 1979). · cites it 2× “[14] See 30 M.R.S.A. § 2051(4) (1964) for another indication that the Legislature intended the petitioners to have some alternative to waiting for the Attorney General to decide whether to enforce their right to town meeting action.”
Dobbs v. Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 50, 419 A.2d 1024 (Me. 1980). “The current law appears at 30 M.R.S.A. § 2051(4) (1978). 8 . The last sentence of section 225(2)(A) was enacted by P.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 2051(4) — 2 cases
Buck v. Town of Yarmouth, 402 A.2d 860 (Me. 1979). “[14] See 30 M.R.S.A. § 2051(4) (1964) for another indication that the Legislature intended the petitioners to have some alternative to waiting for the Attorney General to decide whether to enforce their right to town meeting action.”
Dobbs v. Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 50, 419 A.2d 1024 (Me. 1980). “The current law appears at 30 M.R.S.A. § 2051(4) (1978). 8 . The last sentence of section 225(2)(A) was enacted by P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.