Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 30
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 3773 (2026)

Fire chiefs

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 680, §5 (NEW). PL 1975, c. 421 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 583, §§42,43 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 737, §§A1,C106 (RP). PL 1989, c. 6 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD). PL 1989, c. 104, §§C8,C10 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–1984 · leading case: Brasslett v. Cota, 609 F. Supp. 948 (D. Me. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brasslett v. Cota, 609 F. Supp. 948 (D. Me. 1984). “See 30 M.R.S.A. § 3773(1). The record discloses that during his tenure as fire chief plaintiff was considered a good fireman, see Cota Deposition, at 24, 92, but that his performance as a department head had been called into question by the town manager on more than one occasion.”
Dwyer v. Bartlett, 472 A.2d 431 (Me. 1984). “Compare 30 M.R.S.A. §§ 3773 and 3774 (1978) (imposing certain obligations with respect to fire protection on municipal fire chiefs and firefighters).”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 30, § 3773(1) — 1 case
Brasslett v. Cota, 609 F. Supp. 948 (D. Me. 1984). “See 30 M.R.S.A. § 3773(1). The record discloses that during his tenure as fire chief plaintiff was considered a good fireman, see Cota Deposition, at 24, 92, but that his performance as a department head had been called into question by the town manager on more than one occasion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.