Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 3295 (2026)

Communications between physicians and patients

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1973, c. 625, §218 (NEW). PL 1977, c. 564, §123 (RP).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1978–2020 · leading case: State v. Gatcomb, 389 A.2d 22 (Me. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Gatcomb, 389 A.2d 22 (Me. 1978). “Cloutier on the day of this interview had no previous acquaintance with or exposure to Gatcomb and had not personally treated him either medically or psychiatrically.”
State v. Doughty, 554 A.2d 1189 (Me. 1989). “” 32 M.R.S.A. § 3295 (Pamph. 1973), repealed by P.”
Est. of Carol A. Kennelly v. Mid Coast Hosp., 2020 ME 115 (Me. 2020). · cites it 3× “14 32 M.R.S.A. § 3295 (Supp. 1973).9 In 1976, when we first promulgated the Maine Rules of Evidence in our capacity as the Supreme Judicial Court, we included a rule specifically adopting the physician-patient privilege because we considered the statutory privilege in section…”
Est. of Carol A. Kennelly v. Mid Coast Hosp., 2020 ME 115 (Me. 2020). · cites it 3× “14 32 M.R.S.A. § 3295 (Supp. 1973).9 In 1976, when we first promulgated the Maine Rules of Evidence in our capacity as the Supreme Judicial Court, we included a rule specifically adopting the physician-patient privilege because we considered the statutory privilege in section…”
Est. of Carol A. Kennelly v. Mid Coast Hosp., 2020 ME 115 (Me. 2020). · cites it 3× “14 32 M.R.S.A. § 3295 (Supp. 1973).9 In 1976, when we first promulgated the Maine Rules of Evidence in our capacity as the Supreme Judicial Court, we included a rule specifically adopting the physician-patient privilege because we considered the statutory privilege in section…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.