Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 4056 (2026)

Investigations; hearings; suspension or revocation of license

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(REPEALED)

SECTION HISTORY

PL 1973, c. 303, §3 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 160 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 547, §§15-18 (AMD). PL 1975, c. 767, §§55-58 (AMD). PL 1977, c. 365 (RPR). PL 1977, c. 694, §624 (AMD). PL 1981, c. 359, §10 (AMD). PL 1983, c. 171, §§8,9 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 748, §40 (AMD). PL 1987, c. 395, §A174 (RP).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1976–2019 · leading case: Maine Real Est. Comm'n v. Kelby, 360 A.2d 528 (Me. 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Maine Real Est. Comm'n v. Kelby, 360 A.2d 528 (Me. 1976). · cites it 3× “The complaint was brought pursuant to 32 M.R.S.A. § 4056(1) and charged Kelby with violating § G (“Count I”) and § N (“Count II”) of that statute.”

Maine Real Est. Comm'n v. Anderson, 512 A.2d 351 (Me. 1986). · cites it 2× “Section 858 requires that a civil action for any penalty or forfeiture on a penal statute be commenced by the State within two years of the commission of the offense.”

Pamela A. Denutte v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 2019 ME 124 (Me. 2019). “1986) (concluding that 32 M.R.S.A. § 4056(3) (1978), repealed by P.”

Reardon v. Dep't of Human Servs., 2003 ME 65 (Me. 2003). “[¶ 8] Contrary to the Reardons’ contention, the absence in the satisfactory record rule of a specified amount of time an applicant must be free of violations does not render the rule unduly vague. People of common intelligence could agree that the Reardons’ serious violation of…”

Pamela A. Denutte v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 2019 ME 124 (Me. 2019). “1986) (concluding that 32 M.R.S.A. § 4056(3) (1978), repealed by P.”

Denutte v. U.S. Bank (Me. Super. Ct 2018). “) 6 In Anderson, a real estate broker was found to have violated 32 M.R.S.A. § 4056 (1977), repealed by P.”

Shaw v. Maine Real Est. Comm'n, 428 A.2d 407 (Me. 1981). · cites it 2× “The Real Estate Commission sent Shaw notice of hearing, pursuant to 32 M.R.S.A. § 4056(2), 1 stating in part: NATURE AND PURPOSE This will be an adjudicatory proceeding to determine whether a license should be granted to the applicant.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 4056(1) — 1 case

Maine Real Est. Comm'n v. Kelby, 360 A.2d 528 (Me. 1976). “The complaint was brought pursuant to 32 M.R.S.A. § 4056(1) and charged Kelby with violating § G (“Count I”) and § N (“Count II”) of that statute.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 4056(1)(N) — 2 cases

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 4056(2) — 1 case

Shaw v. Maine Real Est. Comm'n, 428 A.2d 407 (Me. 1981). “The Real Estate Commission sent Shaw notice of hearing, pursuant to 32 M.R.S.A. § 4056(2), 1 stating in part: NATURE AND PURPOSE This will be an adjudicatory proceeding to determine whether a license should be granted to the applicant.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 4056(3) — 2 cases

Pamela A. Denutte v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 2019 ME 124 (Me. 2019). “1986) (concluding that 32 M.R.S.A. § 4056(3) (1978), repealed by P.”

— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 4056(3)(A)(19) — 1 case

Maine Real Est. Comm'n v. Anderson, 512 A.2d 351 (Me. 1986). “Section 858 requires that a civil action for any penalty or forfeiture on a penal statute be commenced by the State within two years of the commission of the offense.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.