Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 33
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 33, § 477-A (2026)

Conservation easement standards

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Conservation values.  A conservation easement executed on or after the effective date of this section must include a statement of the conservation purposes of the easement, the conservation attributes associated with the real property and the benefit to the general public intended to be served by the restriction on uses of the real property subject to the conservation easement.  
[PL 2007, c. 412, §4 (NEW).]
2.  Amendment and termination.  Amendments and termination of a conservation easement may occur only pursuant to this subsection.  
A. A conservation easement executed on or after the effective date of this section must include a statement of the holder's power to agree to amendments to the terms of the conservation easement in a manner consistent with the limitations of paragraph B.   [PL 2007, c. 412, §4 (NEW).]
B. A conservation easement may not be terminated or amended in such a manner as to materially detract from the conservation values intended for protection without the prior approval of the court in an action in which the Attorney General is made a party. In making this determination, the court shall consider, among other relevant factors, the purposes expressed by the parties in the easement and the public interest. If the value of the landowner's estate is increased by reason of the amendment or termination of a conservation easement, that increase must be paid over to the holder or to such nonprofit or governmental entity as the court may designate, to be used for the protection of conservation lands consistent, as nearly as possible, with the stated publicly beneficial conservation purposes of the easement.   [PL 2007, c. 412, §4 (NEW).]
[PL 2007, c. 412, §4 (NEW).]
3.  Monitoring.  The holder of a conservation easement shall monitor the condition of the real property subject to the conservation easement at least every 3 years and shall prepare and retain a written monitoring report in its permanent records. The holder shall make available to the landowner, upon request, a copy of the monitoring report.  
[PL 2007, c. 412, §4 (NEW).]
4.  Failure to comply.  Failure to comply with the requirements of subsection 1, subsection 2, paragraph A or subsection 3 does not invalidate a conservation easement otherwise entitled to the protections of this subchapter.  
[PL 2007, c. 412, §4 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 2007, c. 412, §4 (NEW).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2021 · leading case: Est. of Merrill P. Robbins v. Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust, 2017 ME 17 (Me. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Est. of Merrill P. Robbins v. Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust, 2017 ME 17 (Me. 2017). · cites it 3× “” 33 M.R.S. § 477-A(l) (2016). [¶ 3] The deed also specifically noted the importance of the easement holder’s primary purpose to “promot[e] for the benefit of the general public the preservation of natural resources in the Town of Cumberland and County of Cumberland, including…”
Mabee v. Bd. of Env't Prot. (Me. Super. Ct 2021). “6 Mabee and Grace placed all the intertidal land they claimed under the protection of a conservation easement in perpetuity, pursuant to 33 M.R.S. § 477-A et seq., on April 29, 2019 to underscore their intent to stop Nordic from laying its wastewater pipes there.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 33, § 477-A(l) — 1 case
Est. of Merrill P. Robbins v. Chebeague & Cumberland Land Trust, 2017 ME 17 (Me. 2017). “” 33 M.R.S. § 477-A(l) (2016). [¶ 3] The deed also specifically noted the importance of the easement holder’s primary purpose to “promot[e] for the benefit of the general public the preservation of natural resources in the Town of Cumberland and County of Cumberland, including…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.