Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34-B, § 5475 (2026)

Judicial certification procedures

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1983, c. 459, §7 (NEW). PL 1983, c. 580, §22 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 397, §§1-2 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 503, §10 (AMD). RR 1995, c. 2, §88 (COR). PL 2001, c. 354, §3 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 389, §18 (AMD). PL 2003, c. 689, §B7 (REV). PL 2007, c. 539, Pt. N, §§68, 69 (AMD). PL 2011, c. 542, Pt. A, §116 (AMD). PL 2013, c. 21, §19 (RP).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1985–1993 · leading case: In re Robert D., 486 A.2d 134 (Me. 1985).
In re Robert D., 486 A.2d 134 (Me. 1985). · cites it 4× “They appeal the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County) affirming the District Court’s (Portland) decision certifying their eligibility for admission to Pineland pursuant to 34-B M.R.S.A. § 5475(4) (Supp.1984-1985).”
Consum. Advisory Bd. v. Glover, 151 F.R.D. 490 (D. Me. 1993). · cites it 2× “or is judicially certified for admission in accordance with 34-B M.R.S.A § 5475. Affidavit of Paul P.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34-B, § 5475(4) — 1 case
In re Robert D., 486 A.2d 134 (Me. 1985). “They appeal the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County) affirming the District Court’s (Portland) decision certifying their eligibility for admission to Pineland pursuant to 34-B M.R.S.A. § 5475(4) (Supp.1984-1985).”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34-B, § 5475(5) — 1 case
In re Robert D., 486 A.2d 134 (Me. 1985). “They appeal the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County) affirming the District Court’s (Portland) decision certifying their eligibility for admission to Pineland pursuant to 34-B M.R.S.A. § 5475(4) (Supp.1984-1985).”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 34-B, § 5475(6) — 1 case
In re Robert D., 486 A.2d 134 (Me. 1985). “They appeal the judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County) affirming the District Court’s (Portland) decision certifying their eligibility for admission to Pineland pursuant to 34-B M.R.S.A. § 5475(4) (Supp.1984-1985).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.